41 C.F.R. § 60-1.21

Filing complaints

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Complaints shall be filed within 180 days of the alleged violation unless the time for filing is extended by the Director for good cause shown.

[43 FR 49240, Oct. 20, 1978; 43 FR 51400, Nov. 3, 1978, as amended at 62 FR 66971, Dec. 22, 1997]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 9 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2023 · leading case: Mary GREENE, Appellant, v. CARTER CARBURETOR CO., Appellee, 532 F.2d 125 (8th Cir. 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Mary GREENE, Appellant, v. CARTER CARBURETOR CO., Appellee, 532 F.2d 125 (8th Cir. 1976). “Since no claim was filed with either the OFCC or the EEOC within the 180 days, we need not consider plaintiff’s contention that the OFCC was by memorandum or agreement an authorized agent of the EEOC to receive EEOC charges.”

Legal Aid Soc'y of Alameda Cnty. v. Brennan, 381 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Cal. 1974). · cites it 2× “Ill Defendants also argue that plaintiffs have failed to exhaust their administrative remedies set out in 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.21 et seq. (1973). The regulations in question provide that, “[a]ny employee of any contractor or applicant for employment with such contractor may, .”

Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 412 F. Supp. 171 (D. Del. 1976). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.21 . *174 In investigating a complaint, the DSA generally requests copies of, and reviews, the Plaintiff’s AAP’s, EEO-l’s and related supporting material.”

Isiah Hadnott v. Melvin R. Laird, Individually & in His Capacity as Sec'y of Def. of the United States, 463 F.2d 304 (D.C. Cir. 1972). “41 C.F.R. § 60-1.21 -.23. . 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.”

Lewis v. W. Airlines, Inc., 379 F. Supp. 684 (N.D. Cal. 1974). · cites it 2× “41 C.F.R. §§ 60-1.21 to 60-1.24 (b) (1973).”

Legal Aid Soc'y v. Brennan, 608 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir. 1979). · cites it 2× “These provisions apply to complaints by employers, or applicants for employment, against individual employers for alleged acts of discrimination violating the employer’s contractual obligations to the government.”

Hadnott v. Laird, 317 F. Supp. 379 (D.D.C. 1970). “41 C.F.R. §§ 60-1.21 — 60-1.23. Upon the filing of a complaint the regulations require a prompt investigation and the development of a complete case record of the charges made by the employee or applicant for employment.”

Rice v. KBR (M.D. Penn. 2023). “§ 2000e-5(e)(1) (within 300 days under Title VII); 41 C.F.R. §60-1.21 (within 180 days under regulations governing OFCCP discrimination charges); 43 P.”

Lawrence Aviation Indus., Inc. v. Reich, 28 F. Supp. 2d 728 (E.D.N.Y 1998). “Statute of Limitations for OFCCP Compliance Proceedings Petitioner also argues that the decision of the Secretary should be vacated because the compliance proceeding against LAI was initiated beyond the 180 day filing requirement under 41 C.F.R. § 60-1.21 , which governs the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.