41 C.F.R. § 60-2.13
Placement of incumbents in job groups
The contractor must separately state the percentage of minorities and the percentage of women it employs in each job group established pursuant to § 60-2.12.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1974–2002 · leading case: Legal Aid Soc'y of Alameda Cnty. v. Brennan, 381 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Cal. 1974).
Legal Aid Soc'y of Alameda Cnty. v. Brennan, 381 F. Supp. 125 (N.D. Cal. 1974). “20(b) (1973); and (3) they fail to include additional ingredients required by Revised Order Number 4, 41 C.F.R. § 60-2.13 (1973). 1. Inadequate Utilization Analyses Revised Order Number 4 requires that each affirmative action program contain a detailed and specific utilization…”
O'Connor v. Chrysler Corp., 86 F.R.D. 211 (D. Mass. 1980). “) 41 CFR § 60-2.13 states in part: Effective affirmative action programs shall contain, but not necessarily be limited to, the following ingredients: * * * * * * (g) Design and implementation of internal audit and reporting systems to measure effectiveness of the total program.”
Abrams v. Kelsey-Seybold Med. Grp., Inc., 178 F.R.D. 116 (S.D. Tex. 1997). “12 (m); failure to develop and execute adequate action-oriented programs, in violation of 41 C.F.R. § 60-2.13 (f); and failure to design and implement an adequate internal audit and reporting system to measure the effectiveness of the total program, in violation of 41 C.”
Legal Aid Soc'y v. Brennan, 608 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir. 1979). “18 Affirmative action programs “shall contain” the additional ingredients listed in 41 C.F.R. § 60-2.13 . There is no discretion as to the presence of these components in an acceptable affirmative action plan.”
Annett v. Univ. of Kansas, 216 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (D. Kan. 2002). “41 CFR 60-2.13(d). REMEDY: On April 25, 1995, KU agreed to address the underutilization of minorities and females, and the corrective action it will take to correct the underutilization, by job groups in future AAP’s [sic].”
Firestone Synthetic Rubber & Latex Co. v. Marshall, 507 F. Supp. 1330 (E.D. Tex. 1981). “11; (2) failed to establish goals and timetables where appropriate; and (3) failed to include adequate action-oriented programs to correct identified problem areas in job groups and organizational units as required by 41 C.F.R. §§ 60-2.13 , 2.23 and 2.24. See Decision and Final…”
— 41 C.F.R. § 60-2.13(d) — 1 case
Annett v. Univ. of Kansas, 216 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (D. Kan. 2002). “41 CFR 60-2.13(d). REMEDY: On April 25, 1995, KU agreed to address the underutilization of minorities and females, and the corrective action it will take to correct the underutilization, by job groups in future AAP’s [sic].”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.