C.F.R. » Title 41 » CHAPTER 60—OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 60-2—AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAMS › Subpart B—Purpose and Contents of Affirmative Action Programs

41 C.F.R. § 60-2.15

Comparing incumbency to availability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The contractor must compare the percentage of minorities and women in each job group determined pursuant to § 60-2.13 with the availability for those job groups determined pursuant to § 60-2.14.

(b) When the percentage of minorities or women employed in a particular job group is less than would reasonably be expected given their availability percentage in that particular job group, the contractor must establish a placement goal in accordance with § 60-2.16.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2006–2006 · leading case: John M. Kohlbek, William Schrack, Michael Pritchard v. City of Omaha, Nebraska, a Mun. Corp., 447 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2006).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
John M. Kohlbek, William Schrack, Michael Pritchard v. City of Omaha, Nebraska, a Mun. Corp., 447 F.3d 552 (8th Cir. 2006). “” 41 C.F.R. § 60-2.15 . Omaha described the circumstances requiring a placement goal as “underutilization.”
John M. Kohlbek v. City of Omaha (8th Cir. 2006). “” 41 C.F.R. § 60-2.15 . Omaha described the circumstances requiring a placement goal as “underutilization.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.