41 C.F.R. § 60-20.3
Sex as a bona fide occupational qualification
Contractors may not hire and employ employees on the basis of sex unless sex is a bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ) reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the contractor's particular business or enterprise.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1974–1981 · leading case: Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 (1974).
Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v. LaFleur, 414 U.S. 632 (1974). “401 (b) (Civil Service Commission); 41 CFR § 60-20.3 (g) (Office of Federal Contract Compliance).”
Prescod v. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd., 57 Cal. App. 3d 29 (Cal. Ct. App. 1976). “§§ 202-203 ; 41 C.F.R. § 60-20.3 (g)), and the applicable guidelines under the executive order specifically provided, so far as here pertinent: “(1) Women shall not be penalized in their conditions of employment because they require time away from work on account of childbearing.”
Laurie L. Abraham v. Graphic Arts Int'l Union, 660 F.2d 811 (D.C. Cir. 1981). “See 41 C.F.R. § 60-20.3 (g)(2) (1980). 67 . Compare Nashville Gas Co.”
Pan Am. World Airways, Inc. v. Marshall, 439 F. Supp. 487 (S.D.N.Y. 1977). “41 C.F.R. § 60-20.3 (g)(l) and (2) (1976).”
Geduldig v. Aiello, 417 U.S. 484 (1974). “27, 1973) (proposed 41 CFR § 60-20.3 (h) (2)). [8] However, "[i]t is important to remember, especially in the cost context, that if an employee is being paid his regular pay while disabled, he cannot collect disability pay.”
Contractor's Payment of Employees' Membership Dues for Private Clubs With Discriminatory Practices (OLC 1977). “A nother provision cited in the memorandum is 41 C FR § 60-20.3(c), which states that an employer “must not make any distinction based upon sex in employment opportunities.”
— 41 C.F.R. § 60-20.3(c) — 1 case
Contractor's Payment of Employees' Membership Dues for Private Clubs With Discriminatory Practices (OLC 1977). “A nother provision cited in the memorandum is 41 C FR § 60-20.3(c), which states that an employer “must not make any distinction based upon sex in employment opportunities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.