41 C.F.R. § 60-30.1

Applicability of rules

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This part provides the rules of practice for all administrative proceedings, instituted by the OFCCP including but not limited to proceedings instituted against construction contractors or subcontractors, which relate to the enforcement of equal opportunity under Executive Order 11246, as amended. In the absence of a specific provision, procedures shall be in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1976–1979 · leading case: United States v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 480 F. Supp. 705 (E.D. La. 1979).
United States v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 480 F. Supp. 705 (E.D. La. 1979). “See 41 C.F.R. § 60-30.1 — 30.30 (1978). The requirement of an adversary hearing in both the district court and administrative settings before an injunction is issued ensures that the standard of reasonableness mandated by the fourth amendment is met.”
Am. Cyanamid Co., Lederle Lab. v. Roudebush, 411 F. Supp. 1220 (S.D.N.Y. 1976). “The hearing is conducted by the OFCC ( 41 C.F.R. § 60-30.1 ) before a hearing examiner under the direction of the Secretary of Labor ( 41 C.”
Uniroyal, Inc. v. Marshall, 579 F.2d 1060 (7th Cir. 1978). “The challenged rules are published at 41 C.F.R. § 60-30.1 (last sentence), which provides that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure shall control in the absence of a specific provision, § 60-30.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.