C.F.R. » Title 41 » CHAPTER 60—OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR › PART 60-30—RULES OF PRACTICE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER 11246

41 C.F.R. § 60-30.30

Administrative Order

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

After expiration of the time for filing, the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, shall make a decision which shall be served on all parties. If the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, concludes that the defendant has violated the Executive Order, the equal opportunity clause, or the regulations, an Administrative Order shall be issued enjoining the violations, and requiring the contractor to provide whatever remedies are appropriate, and imposing whatever sanctions are appropriate, or any of the above. In any event, failure to comply with the Administrative Order shall result in the immediate cancellation, termination, and suspension of the respondent's contracts and/or debarment of the respondent from further contracts.

[85 FR 30627, May 20, 2020]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1979–1997 · leading case: United States v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 480 F. Supp. 705 (E.D. La. 1979).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. New Orleans Pub. Serv., Inc., 480 F. Supp. 705 (E.D. La. 1979). “41 C.F.R. § 60-30.30 (1978). The question has only peripheral relevance in the instant case, since we are here concerned with a suit brought for injunction in this court, a United States district court.”
Volvo GM Heavy Truck Corp. v. United States Dep't of Labor, 118 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1997). “See 41 C.F.R. 60-30.30 (1996). Indisputably, Volvo GM has not yet taken such an appeal.”
74 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 399, 71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,839 Volvo Gm Heavy Truck Corp. v. United States Dep't of Labor Robert B. Reich, Sec'y of Labor Shirley Wilcher, Deputy Assistant Sec'y for Fed. Contract Compliance Programs, 118 F.3d 205 (4th Cir. 1997). “See 41 C.F.R. 60-30.30 (1996). Indisputably, Volvo GM has not yet taken such an appeal.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.