C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER V—OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL-HEALTH CARE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER B—OIG AUTHORITIES › PART 1004—IMPOSITION OF SANCTIONS ON HEALTH CARE PRACTITIONERS AND PROVIDERS OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES BY A QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ORGANIZATION › Subpart E—Effect and Duration of Exclusion

42 C.F.R. § 1004.130

Reinstatement after exclusion

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A practitioner or other person who has been excluded in accordance with this part may apply for reinstatement at the end of the period of exclusion. The OIG will consider any request for reinstatement in accordance with provisions of §§ 1001.3001 through 1001.3005 of this chapter.

(b) The OIG may also consider a practitioner's or other person's compliance with the certification obligation in § 1004.110(d) at the time of reinstatement.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1987–1992 · leading case: Anderson v. Sullivan, 959 F.2d 690 (8th Cir. 1992).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Anderson v. Sullivan, 959 F.2d 690 (8th Cir. 1992). · cites it 2× “” 4 We agree with the district court that the Social Security Act precludes general federal subject matter jurisdiction until administrative remedies have been exhausted.”
Cassim v. Bowen, 824 F.2d 791 (9th Cir. 1987). “§ 1320c-5(b)(4) (1982); 42 C.F.R. § 1004.130 (1986). Neither the Social Security Act nor its regulations guarantee the timeliness of the hearing on appeal.”
Lavapies v. Bowen, 687 F. Supp. 1193 (S.D. Ohio 1988). “42 C.F.R. § 1004.130 (a)(1). At this hearing, the practitioner is entitled to call witnesses under oath, to cross-examine witnesses, and to submit documents, briefs and oral argument.”
Papendick v. Bowen, 658 F. Supp. 1425 (W.D. Wis. 1987). “42 C.F.R. § 1004.130 (a)(1). At this hearing the practitioner is entitled to call witnesses under oath, to cross-examine all witnesses, to submit documents, briefs and oral argument.”
Doyle v. Sec'y of Health & Human Servs., 848 F.2d 296 (1st Cir. 1988). “42 C.F.R. § 1004.130 (a). He is also entitled to review of a final agency decision in federal court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.