C.F.R. » Title 42 » CHAPTER IV—CENTERS FOR MEDICARE & MEDICAID SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER B—MEDICARE PROGRAM › PART 405—FEDERAL HEALTH INSURANCE FOR THE AGED AND DISABLED › Subpart R—Provider Reimbursement Determinations and Appeals

42 C.F.R. § 405.1803

Contractor determination and notice of amount of program reimbursement

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) General requirement. Upon receipt of a provider's cost report, or amended cost report where permitted or required, the contractor must within a reasonable period of time (as specified in § 405.1835(c)(1)), furnish the provider and other parties as appropriate (see § 405.1805) a written notice reflecting the contractor's final determination of the total amount of reimbursement due the provider. The contractor must include the following information in the notice, as appropriate:

(1) Reasonable cost. The notice must—

(i) Explain the contractor's determination of total program reimbursement due the provider on the basis of reasonable cost for the reporting period covered by the cost report or amended cost report; and

(ii) Relate this determination to the provider's claimed total program reimbursement due the provider for this period.

(2) Prospective payment. With respect to a hospital that receives payments for inpatient hospital services under the prospective payment system (see part 412 of this chapter), the contractor must include in the notice its determination of the total amount of the payments due the hospital under that system for the cost reporting period covered by the notice. The notice must explain (with appropriate use of the applicable money amounts) any difference in the amount determined to be due, and the amounts received by the hospital during the cost reporting period covered by the notice.

(3) Hospice caps. With respect to a hospice, the reporting period for the cap calculation is the cap year; and the contractors' determination of program reimbursement letter, which provides the results of the inpatient and aggregate cap calculations, shall serve as a notice of program reimbursement. The time period for filing cap appeals begins with receipt of the determination of program reimbursement letter.

(b) Requirements for contractor notices. The contractor must include in each notice appropriate references to law, regulations, CMS Rulings, or program instructions to explain why the contractor's determination of the amount of program reimbursement for the period differs from the amount the provider claimed. The notice must also inform the provider of its right to contractor or Board hearing (see §§ 405.1809, 405.1811, 405.1815, 405.1835, and 405.1843) and that the provider must request the hearing within 180 days after the date of receipt of the notice.

(c) Use of notice as basis for recoupment of overpayments. The contractor's determination contained in its notice is the basis for making the retroactive adjustment (required by § 413.64(f) of this chapter) to any program payments made to the provider during the period to which the determination applies, including recoupment under § 405.373 from ongoing payments to the provider of any overpayments to the provider identified in the determination. Recoupment is made notwithstanding any request for hearing on the determination the provider may make under § 405.1811 or § 405.1835.

(d) Effect of certain final agency decisions and final court judgments; audits of self-disallowed and other items. (1) This paragraph applies to the following administrative decisions and court judgments:

(i) A final hearing decision by the contractor (as described in § 405.1833 of this subpart) or the Board (as described in § 405.1871(b) of this subpart).

(ii) A final decision by a CMS reviewing official (as described in § 405.1834(f)(1) of this subpart) or the Administrator (as described in § 405.1875(e)(4) of this subpart) following review of a hearing decision by the contractor or the Board, respectively.

(iii) A final, non-appealable judgment by a court on a Medicare reimbursement issue that the court rendered in accordance with jurisdiction under section 1878 of the Act (as described in §§ 405.1842 and 405.1877 of this subpart).

(2) For any final agency decision or final court judgment specified in paragraph (d)(1) of this section, the contractor must promptly, upon notification from CMS—

(i) Determine the effect of the final decision or judgment on the contractor determination for the cost reporting period at issue in the decision or judgment; and

(ii) Issue any revised contractor determination, and make any additional program payment, or recoup or offset any program payment (as described in § 405.371 of this subpart), for the period that may be necessary to implement the final decision or judgment on the specific matters at issue in the decision or judgment.

(3) CMS may require the contractor to audit any item, including any self-disallowed item, at issue in an appeal or a civil action, before any revised contractor determination or additional Medicare payment, recoupment, or offset may be determined for an item under paragraph (d)(2) of this section.

(4) For any final settlement agreement, whether for an appeal to the contractor hearing officer(s) or the Board or for a civil action before a court, the contractor must implement the settlement agreement in accordance with paragraphs (d)(2) and (d)(3) of this section, unless a particular administrative or judicial settlement agreement provides otherwise.

[48 FR 39834, Sept. 1, 1983, as amended at 49 FR 322, Jan. 3, 1984; 51 FR 34793, Sept. 30, 1986; 61 FR 63748, Dec. 2, 1996; 73 FR 30244, May 23, 2008; 74 FR 39412, Aug. 6, 2009; 80 FR 70597, Nov. 13, 2015]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 215 cases (12 in the last 5 years), 1980–2026 · leading case: United States v. Bourseau, 531 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2008).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Bourseau, 531 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “42 C.F.R. §§ 405.1803 , 413.9(b)(1), 413.”
United States Ex Rel. Conner v. Salina Reg'l Health Ctr., Inc., 543 F.3d 1211 (10th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 (c). It is within the annual cost report that Conner urges us to find an express false certification.”
United States of Am., Ex Rel. A+ Homecare, Inc. v. Medshares Mgmt. Grp., Inc. Trevecca Home Health Servs., Inc., Stephen H. Winters, 400 F.3d 428 (6th Cir. 2005). · cites it 2× “42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 (a). The NPR provides the basis for making any retroactive adjustments, including recoupments for-overpay-ments made during the year.”
United States Ex Rel. Drakeford v. Tuomey, 792 F.3d 364 (4th Cir. 2015). · cites it 2× “Medicare relies upon the hospital cost report to determine whether the provider is entitled to more reimbursement than already received through interim payments, or whether the provider has been overpaid and must reimburse Medicare.”
Regions Hosp. v. Shalala, 522 U.S. 448 (1998). · cites it 2× “The NAPR determines the total amount payable to the provider for Medicare services during *453 the reporting period, 42 CFR § 405.1803 (1996), and is subject to review by the Provider Reimbursement Review Board (PRRB), the Secretary, and ultimately the courts.”
In Re: Tlc Hospitals, Inc., a California Corp., Debtor. Charles Sims v. United States Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 224 F.3d 1008 (9th Cir. 2000). · cites it 3× “42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 (a). The audit entails a reconciliation of the amount due to the provider under the Medicare statute with the amount of estimated interim payments dispensed for the same period.”
Thomas Jefferson Univ. v. Shalala, 512 U.S. 504 (1994). “See 42 CFR §405.1803 (1993). Although petitioner sought reimbursement for the full $8.”
Kaiser Found. Hospitals v. Kathleen Sebelius, 708 F.3d 226 (D.C. Cir. 2013). · cites it 3× “§ 1395h; 42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 . Among other things, Medicare reimburses approved teaching hospitals for the direct costs of graduate medical education (GME) — e.”
Abington Mem'l Hosp. v. Burwell, 216 F. Supp. 3d 110 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 2× “3d at 401 ; see also 42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 . Thus, inpatient hospitals are understandably interested in the process by which HHS constructs and applies the regional wage indices, and they generally proceed in the hope that the wage data the agency gathers from the cost reports…”
Banner Health v. Sebelius, 945 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 2× “42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 . 8 . The Amended Complaint identifies each specific FY of Medicare reimbursement that each separate hospital plaintiff is challenging.”
Kaiser Found. Hospitals v. Sebelius, 828 F. Supp. 2d 193 (D.D.C. 2011). · cites it 2× “§ 1395h; 42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 . Among other things, Medicare reimburses approved teaching hospitals for the direct costs of graduate medical education (GME) — e.”
V.N.A. Of Greater Tift Cnty., Inc., a Georgia Non-Profit Corp. v. Margaret M. Heckler & Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Georgia/columbus, Inc., 711 F.2d 1020 (11th Cir. 1983). · cites it 2× “42 C.F.R. § 405.1803 (b). This suspension must be imposed by the intermediary and the suspension must continue until the overpayment is liquidated or an agreement is reached, notwithstanding any administrative appeal taken by the provider.”
Show all 215 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.