42 C.F.R. § 411.51
Beneficiary's responsibility with respect to no-fault insurance
(a) The beneficiary is responsible for taking whatever action is necessary to obtain any payment that can reasonably be expected under no-fault insurance.
(b) Except as specified in § 411.53, Medicare does not pay until the beneficiary has exhausted his or her remedies under no-fault insurance.
(c) Except as specified in § 411.53, Medicare does not pay for services that would have been covered by the no-fault insurance if the beneficiary had filed a proper claim.
(d) However, if a claim is denied for reasons other than not being a proper claim, Medicare pays for the services if they are covered under Medicare.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. v. MSPA Claims, 1
Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. v. MSPA Claims, 1 (2018)
“" 42 C.F.R. § 411.51 (emphasis added). As this language indicates, the Secondary Payer Act does not supersede an existing State insurance policy: it merely requires the exhaustion of the benefits under that policy.”
Lynette Duncan v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. (2021)
“Regulatory Burden The only statutory harms that Lynette Duncan asserts are a statutory violation and a regulatory burden under 42 C.F.R. § 411.51 (a). As explained above, a statutory violation of the MSPA does not bestow Article III standing on a private plaintiff who was not…”
Ocean Harbor Cas. Ins. v. MSPA Claims, 1 (2018)
“" 42 C.F.R. § 411.51 (emphasis added). As this language indicates, the Secondary Payer Act does not supersede an existing State insurance policy: it merely requires the exhaustion of the benefits under that policy.”
MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and Series 16-08-483, a designated series of MSP (2026)
“For example, 42 C.F.R. §411.51 , entitled “Beneficiary’s responsibility with respect to no-fault insurance”, provides: “(a) The beneficiary is responsible for taking whatever action is necessary to obtain payment that can reasonably be expected under no-fault insurance.”
Smith v. Farmers Insurance Exchange (1998)
“Also, 42 C.F.R. §411.51 (a) provides that “the beneficiary is responsible for taking whatever action is necessary to obtain any payment that can reasonably be expected under no-fault insurance.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.