42 C.F.R. § 83.0

Background information on the procedures in this part

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act, as amended (“EEOICPA” or “the Act”), 42 U.S.C. 7384-7385, provides for the payment of compensation benefits to covered employees and, where applicable, survivors of such employees, of DOE, its predecessor agencies and certain of its contractors and subcontractors. Among the types of illnesses for which compensation may be provided are cancers. There are two methods set forth in the statute for claimants to establish that a cancer incurred by a covered worker is compensable under EEOICPA. The first is to establish that the cancer is at least as likely as not related to covered employment at a DOE or Atomic Weapons Employer (“AWE”) facility pursuant to guidelines issued by the Department of Health and Human Services (“HHS”), which are found at 42 CFR part 81. The second method to establish that a cancer incurred by a covered worker is compensable under EEOICPA is to establish that the worker is a member of the Special Exposure Cohort (“the Cohort”) and suffered a specified cancer after beginning employment at a DOE facility or AWE facility. In Section 3621(14) of EEOICPA (42 U.S.C. 7384l(14)) Congress included certain classes of employees in the Cohort. Section 3626 of the Act (42 U.S.C. 7384q) authorizes the addition to the Cohort of other classes of employees. This authority has been delegated to the Secretary of HHS by Executive Order 13179.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2021 · leading case: Harger v. Dep't of Labor, 569 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2009).
Harger v. Dep't of Labor, 569 F.3d 898 (9th Cir. 2009). “§ 7384Z(14); 42 C.F.R. § 83.0 . The President, on advice of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (“Board”), may designate new classes of workers for addition to the Cohort.”
Opal Harger v. Dep't of Labor, 560 F.3d 1071 (9th Cir. 2009). “§ 73841 (14); 42 C.F.R. § 83.0 . The President, on advice of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (“Board”), may designate new classes of workers for addition to the Cohort.”
Young v. United States Dep't of Labor (D.D.C. 2020). · cites it 3× “” 42 C.F.R. § 83.0 . These two methods are, effectively, two different ways to satisfy the third eligibility criteria (at-least-as-likely-as-not causation between an employee’s cancer and prior DOE employment).”
Young v. United States Dep't of Labor (D.D.C. 2021). · cites it 3× “” 42 C.F.R. § 83.0 . The first method is to establish that the employee’s cancer was “at least as likely as not” related to employment at the covered facility (i.”
Opal Harger v. Dep't of Labor (9th Cir. 2009). “§ 7384l(14); 42 C.F.R. § 83.0 . The Presi- dent, on advice of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health (“Board”), may designate new classes of workers for addition to the Cohort.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.