43 C.F.R. § 2920.3
Bureau of Land Management initiated land use proposals
Where, as a result of the land use planning process, the desirability of allowing use of the public lands or providing increased service to the public from such use of the public lands is demonstrated, the authorized officer may identify a use for the public land and notify the public that proposals for utilizing the land through a lease, permit or easement will be considered.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1973–2000 · leading case: Gary Thompson, an Incompetent, by Charles F. Thompson, His Guardian Ad Litem v. United States, 592 F.2d 1104 (9th Cir. 1979).
Gary Thompson, an Incompetent, by Charles F. Thompson, His Guardian Ad Litem v. United States, 592 F.2d 1104 (9th Cir. 1979). “” This regional office instruction could not constitute an assumption of liability or responsibility by the government for injury to participants, as this would conflict with 43 C.F.R. 2920.3(d), which states: “(d) Liability.”
N. Alaska Env't Ctr. v. State, Dep't of Nat. Resources, 2 P.3d 629 (Alaska 2000). “43 C.F.R. § 2920.3 (a)(1)(1972) provided: "A special land use permit will be revocable in the discretion of the authorized officer at any time, upon notice, if in his judgment the lands should be devoted to another use, or the conditions of the permit have been breached.”
The Wilderness Soc'y v. Rogers C. B. Morton, Sec'y of the Interior, 479 F.2d 842 (D.C. Cir. 1973). “” In addition, 43 C.F.R. § 2920.3 (a)(1) (1972) provides: “A special land-use permit will be revocable in the discretion of the authorized officer at any time, upon notice, if in his judgment the lands should be devoted to another use, or the conditions of the permit, have been…”
— 43 C.F.R. § 2920.3(d) — 1 case
Gary Thompson, an Incompetent, by Charles F. Thompson, His Guardian Ad Litem v. United States, 592 F.2d 1104 (9th Cir. 1979). “” This regional office instruction could not constitute an assumption of liability or responsibility by the government for injury to participants, as this would conflict with 43 C.F.R. 2920.3(d), which states: “(d) Liability.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.