43 C.F.R. § 3162.5
Environment and safety
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 2014–2014 · leading case: Barlow & Haun, Inc. v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 597 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
Barlow & Haun, Inc. v. United States, 118 Fed. Cl. 597 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “at 10,334; accord 43 C.F.R. § 3162.5 -l(a). And, the BLM may condition its approval of an APD on the applicant taking “reasonable mitigation measures to ensure that the proposed operations minimize adverse impacts to other resources, uses, and users, consistent with granted…”
Kc Resources, Inc. v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 602 (Fed. Cl. 2014). “See 43 C.F.R. § 3162.5 — 1(b) (BLM regulation stating that, upon conclusion of operations, “the operator shall reclaim the disturbed surface in a manner approved or reasonably prescribed by the authorized officer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.