43 C.F.R. § 4.1158
Appeals
Any party may petition the Board to review the decision of an administrative law judge concerning an assessment according to the procedures set forth in § 4.1270.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1982–1987 · leading case: B & M Coal Corp., Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Off. of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enf't, Counter-Claimant-Appellee, 699 F.2d 381 (7th Cir. 1983).
B & M Coal Corp., Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Off. of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enf't, Counter-Claimant-Appellee, 699 F.2d 381 (7th Cir. 1983). “§ 1276 (a)(2); 43 C.F.R. § 4.1158 . III It is settled that “due process is flexible and calls for such procedural protections as the particular situation demands.”
United States v. Crooksville Coal Co., Inc., 560 F. Supp. 141 (S.D. Ohio 1982). “§ 1276 (a)(2); 43 C.F.R. § 4.1158 . III. Constitutionality of § 1268 The above description of the civil penalty assessment procedures authorized by 30 U.”
United States v. Stanley Finley, 835 F.2d 134 (6th Cir. 1987). “§ 1276 (a)(2); 43 C.F.R. § 4.1158 . III. Statement of Facts On February 5, 1980, OSMRE Inspector Steve Martin conducted an inspection of Finley’s mining operation in Clay County, Kentucky.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.