C.F.R. » Title 45 » CHAPTER XIII—ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › SUBCHAPTER C—THE ADMINISTRATION FOR COMMUNITY LIVING › PART 1321—GRANTS TO STATE AND COMMUNITY PROGRAMS ON AGING › Subpart B—State Agency Responsibilities

45 C.F.R. § 1321.37

Notification of State plan amendment receipt for changes not requiring Assistant Secretary for Aging approval

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The State agency shall submit an amendment not requiring Assistant Secretary for Aging approval as set forth at § 1321.31(b) to the appropriate ACL Regional Office. The ACL Regional Office shall review the amendment to confirm the contents do not require approval of the Assistant Secretary for Aging and will acknowledge receipt of the State plan amendment by notifying the head of the State agency in writing.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1988–1995 · leading case: Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens v. Bland, 775 F. Supp. 191 (W.D. Va. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens v. Bland, 775 F. Supp. 191 (W.D. Va. 1991). · cites it 3× “” 45 C.F.R. § 1321.37 (a) (1990). In addition, the state plan must “include proposed methods for carrying out the preference____” 42 U.”
Meek v. Martinez, 724 F. Supp. 888 (S.D. Fla. 1989). · cites it 2× “45 C.F.R. § 1321.37 (1986) (emphasis added).”
Martinez v. Wilson, 32 F.3d 1415 (9th Cir. 1994). · cites it 2× “See 45 C.F.R. § 1321.37 (a). . Our statement that the present plan complies with the OAA, like the similar statement of the district court, is not to be taken as binding on the Secretary in future decisions regarding the adequacy of the State's IFF.”
DeHarder Inv. Corp. v. Indiana Hous. Fin. Auth., 909 F. Supp. 606 (S.D. Ind. 1995). “at 827 , quoting 45 C.F.R. § 1321.37 (a). In addition, the court found persuasive the fact that the OAA required that the state formulae be submitted to Administration on Aging for approval.”
Sw. Missouri Off. on Aging v. Missouri Dep't of Soc. Servs., 850 F. Supp. 816 (W.D. Mo. 1994). · cites it 2× “” 45 CFR § 1321.37 (a). The OAA defines the terms “greatest economic need” and “greatest social need.”
City of Chicago v. Lindley, 66 F.3d 819 (7th Cir. 1995). “” 45 C.F.R. § 1321.37 (a). This provision tracks the amorphous statutory language set forth in 42 U.”
Appalachian Agency for Senior Citizens v. Ferguson, 702 F. Supp. 1262 (W.D. Va. 1988). “ANALYSIS The gist of Plaintiffs’ argument is as follows: 45 C.F.R. 1321.37 is of critical significance to this case.”
— 45 C.F.R. § 1321.37(a) — 1 case
Martinez v. Wilson, 32 F.3d 1415 (9th Cir. 1994). “See 45 C.F.R. § 1321.37 (a). . Our statement that the present plan complies with the OAA, like the similar statement of the district court, is not to be taken as binding on the Secretary in future decisions regarding the adequacy of the State's IFF.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.