45 C.F.R. § 160.300

Applicability

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This subpart applies to actions by the Secretary, covered entities, business associates, and others with respect to ascertaining the compliance by covered entities and business associates with, and the enforcement of, the applicable provisions of this part 160 and parts 162 and 164 of this subchapter.

[78 FR 5690, Jan. 25, 2013]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2005–2006 · leading case: Thomas v. State Employees Grp. Benefits, 934 So. 2d 753 (La. Ct. App. 2006).
Thomas v. State Employees Grp. Benefits, 934 So. 2d 753 (La. Ct. App. 2006). “§ 1320d-2; and 45 C.F.R. §§ 160.300 , et seq. [6] We distinguish the present factual situation from one in which confidential medical records or private, personal photographs are repetitively exhibited or published by an unauthorized possessor.”
State v. Downs, 923 So. 2d 726 (La. Ct. App. 2005). “[1] Relator filed a motion in limine to exclude introduction of relator's medical records from evidence on the ground that the State failed to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1986, 45 C.F.R. § 160.300 et seq., and La. R.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.