45 C.F.R. § 1632.3
Prohibition
(a) Neither the Corporation nor any recipient shall make available any funds, personnel, or equipment for use in advocating or opposing any plan or proposal, or representing any party, or participating in any other way in litigation, related to redistricting.
(b) This part does not prohibit any litigation brought by a recipient under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1971 et seq., provided such litigation does not involve redistricting.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1990–1991 · leading case: Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. v. Legal Services Corporation
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. v. Legal Services Corporation (1991)
“” 45 C.F.R. § 1632.3 . As revised prior to being finalized, the regulation *689 makes clear that (1) litigation under the Voting Rights Act is permissible so long as it does not involve redistricting; (2) the prohibition does not prevent recipients from using public or tribal…”
Texas Rural Legal Aid, Inc. v. Legal Services Corp. (1990)
“” 45 CFR section 1632.3. “Redistricting” is defined as “any effort, directly or indirectly, to participate in the revision or reapportionment of a legislative, judicial, or elective district at any level of government, including influencing the timing or manner of the taking of…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.