45 C.F.R. § 164.534
Compliance dates for initial implementation of the privacy standards
(a) Health care providers. A covered health care provider must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than April 14, 2003.
(b) Health plans. A health plan must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than the following as applicable:
(1) Health plans other than small health plans. April 14, 2003.
(2) Small health plans. April 14, 2004.
(c) Health clearinghouses. A health care clearinghouse must comply with the applicable requirements of this subpart no later than April 14, 2003.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases, 2002–2015 · leading case: Arons v. Jutkowitz, 880 N.E.2d 831 (NY 2007).
Arons v. Jutkowitz, 880 N.E.2d 831 (NY 2007). “[2] In most instances, compliance with the Rule was required by April 14, 2003 (45 CFR 164.534). The Privacy Rule forbids an organization subject to its requirements (a "covered entity") from using or disclosing an individual's health information ("protected health information")…”
Tapp v. State, 108 S.W.3d 459 (Tex. App. 2003). “45 C.F.R. § 164.534 (2002). Thus, a hospital, defined as a health care provider, 6 was only required to comply with the regulations after April 14, 2003.”
Kirsch v. State, 276 S.W.3d 579 (Tex. App. 2008). “See 45 C.F.R. § 164.534 (2006). Pursuant to HIPAA, the Department of Health and Human Services promulgated regulations to protect against inappropriate use of patients’ medical information.”
Murray v. State, 245 S.W.3d 37 (Tex. App. 2008). “See 45 C.F.R. § 164.534 (2006) (compliance dates for initial implementation of the privacy standards); Ramos v.”
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena John Doe No. A01-209, 197 F. Supp. 2d 512 (E.D. Va. 2002). “See 45 C.F.R. § 164.534 . The HIPPA regulations define the circumstances under which patient medical records may be disclosed by health plans, health care clearinghouses, and most health care providers.”
Citizens for Health v. Sec'y HHS, 428 F.3d 167 (3rd Cir. 2005). “45 C.F.R. § 164.534 . 6 . The statutory language, as well as the Rule, limits the applicability of the provisions of the Rule to "covered entities”.”
Calvert v. Roadway Express Inc., 139 F. App'x 10 (10th Cir. 2005). “Appellant concedes that the deposition was in another case, appellant fails to demonstrate that the documents were not lawfully in appellee’s possession at that time, and appellant has not shown that HIPAA applied at that time, see 45 C.F.R. § 164.534 . We also reject…”
Harmon, Derek v. State (Tex. App. 2003). “…appellant's medical records were sought because the HIPAA regulations did not become effective until April 14, 2003. 45 C.F.R. § 164.534 (a) (2001).”
Brian Thomas Kirsch v. State (Tex. App. 2008). “See 45 C.F.R. § 164.534 (2006). Pursuant to HIPAA, the Department of Health and Human Services promulgated regulations to protect against inappropriate use of patients’ medical information.”
Matthew Devin Yocom A/K/A Mattew Devin Yocom v. State (Tex. App. 2004). “As the basis for these points, Yocom argues that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) overruled State v. Hardy. 5 The initial date for covered entities, like the hospital in this case, to comply with the privacy standards of HIPPA was April 14, 2002.”
Matthew Devin Yocom A/K/A Mattew Devin Yocom v. State (Tex. App. 2004). “As the basis for these points, Yocom argues that the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA) overruled State v. Hardy. (footnote: 5) The initial date for covered entities, like the hospital in this case, to comply with the privacy standards of HIPPA was April…”
Christopher Richard Murray v. State (Tex. App. 2007). “See 45 C.F.R. § 164.534 (2006) (compliance dates for initial implementation of the privacy standards); Ramos v.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.