C.F.R. » Title 45 » CHAPTER II—OFFICE OF FAMILY ASSISTANCE (ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS), ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › PART 201—GRANTS TO STATES FOR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAMS › Subpart B—Review and Audits

45 C.F.R. § 201.10

Review of State and local administration

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In order to provide a basis for determining that State agencies are adhering to Federal requirements and to the substantive legal and administrative provisions of their approved plans, the Administration conducts a review of State and local public assistance administration. This review includes analysis of procedures and policies of State and local agencies and examination of case records of individual recipients.

(b) Each State agency is required to carry out a continuing quality control program primarily covering determination of eligibility in statistically selected samples of individual cases. The Service conducts a continuing observation of these State systems.

(c) Adherence to other Federal requirements set forth in the pertinent titles of the Act and the regulations in this title is evaluated through review of selected case records and aspects of agency operations.

[35 FR 12180, July 29, 1970, as amended at 53 FR 36579, Sept. 21, 1988]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1974–1996 · leading case: United States v. Aloi, 449 F. Supp. 698 (E.D.N.Y 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States v. Aloi, 449 F. Supp. 698 (E.D.N.Y 1977). “See 45 C.F.R. § 201.10 (a) and (c) (1976). If a state is found in non-compliance with the federal statute, federal funds can be withheld, 42 U.”
Med. Servs. Admin., Etc. v. United States of Am., 590 F.2d 135 (5th Cir. 1979). “See 45 C.F.R. §§ 201.10 to 201.14. States are notified by letter from the regional commissioner of HEW that federal funds for the disallowed expenditure are being withheld.”
Cnty. of Marin v. Martin, 43 Cal. App. 3d 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 1974). · cites it 2× “, 45 C.F.R. § 201.10 ). It is the “state administration” which is responsible for the close supervision of the county agencies.”
Minnesota v. Heckler, 718 F.2d 852 (8th Cir. 1983). “Administrative procedures governing federal audit agency issues are set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 201.10 - 66 (1982). . HHS does not contest the district court’s jurisdiction to review a disallowance decision.”
State Dep't of Pub. Welfare v. Califano, 556 F.2d 326 (5th Cir. 1977). “See 45 C.F.R. §§ 201.10 to 201.14. 3 States are notified by letter from the regional commissioner of HEW that federal funds for the disallowed expenditure are being withheld.”
Dorsey v. Tompkins, 917 F. Supp. 1195 (S.D. Ohio 1996). “45 C.F.R. § 201.10 . Matters such as determining eligibility for benefits and the calculation of benefits provided to each recipient are left to the state administrative process.”
Cook v. Liddle, 85 Misc. 2d 961 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1976). “The regulations thereunder (45 CFR 201.10[a] [2] [i]), require that applicants shall be informed of the requirements and their rights and be given appropriate information.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.