45 C.F.R. § 201.2
General
The State plan is a comprehensive statement submitted by the State agency describing the nature and scope of its program and giving assurance that it will be administered in conformity with the specific requirements stipulated in the pertinent title of the Act, the regulations in subtitle A and this chapter of this title, and other applicable official issuances of the Department. The State plan contains all information necessary for the Administration to determine whether the plan can be approved, as a basis for Federal financial participation in the State program.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases, 1973–2002 · leading case: St AZ v. Thompson, Tommy G., 281 F.3d 248 (D.C. Cir. 2002).
St AZ v. Thompson, Tommy G., 281 F.3d 248 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “See 45 C.F.R. §§ 201.2 , 201.3 (1995). Administrative costs, by contrast, were addressed in the states’ “cost allocation plans,” which set forth the states’ accounting methods.”
Green v. Philbrook, 427 F. Supp. 834 (D. Vt. 1977). “…set forth in 42 U.S.C. § 602 (a) and implementing federal regulations and policies. 42 U.S.C. §§ 602 (b), 603; 45 C.F.R. §§ 201.2 , -.3. The regulations challenged in this action implement § 402(a)(25) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 602 (a)(25), which was added…”
United States v. Aloi, 449 F. Supp. 698 (E.D.N.Y 1977). “45 C.F.R. §§ 201.2 , 201.3 (1976). After such an approval, the federal government is obligated to expend federal funds to pay a percentage of the cost of the state program.”
Hempstead Gen. Hosp. v. Whalen, 474 F. Supp. 398 (E.D.N.Y 1979). “§ 1396a(a)(13)(D) & (E) and § 1396a(b); 45 CFR § 201.2 et seq. (1978). See also 42 CFR § 447.”
Panthers v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health, Educ. & Welfare, 461 F. Supp. 319 (D.D.C. 1978). “45 C.F.R. § 201.2 . If the state submits a plan which fulfills all the requirements of the Act, the Secretary must approve it.”
Chambers v. Klein, 419 F. Supp. 569 (D.N.J. 1976). “§ 602 (a)(25) requires that a state program provide (A) that, as a condition of eligibility under the plan, each applicant for or recipient of aid shall furnish to the State agency his social security number .”
Virginia Hosp. Ass'n v. Baliles, 868 F.2d 653 (4th Cir. 1989). “The regulations suggest that the Secretary's task is not to consider the reasonableness of reimbursement rates at large, but rather to consider the adequacy of state assurances that "the methods and standards used by the [State] to set payment rates [are] consistent with 45…”
Johnson v. Harder, 383 F. Supp. 174 (D. Conn. 1974). “’45 C.F.R. § 201.2. Its weight, therefore, while not decisive, does merit some consideration as to whether, in the view of the agency administering Social Security programs, there exists a conflict between the Federal and State policies.”
Tinkham v. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 417 N.E.2d 452 (Mass. App. Ct. 1981). “Title 45 C.F.R. § 201.2 (1980) describes a State plan as “a comprehensive statement submitted by the State agency describing the nature and scope of its program and giving assurance that it will be administered in conformity with the specific .”
Virginia Hosp. Ass'n v. Baliles, 868 F.2d 653 (4th Cir. 1989). “The regulations suggest that the Secretary’s task is not to consider the reasonableness of reimbursement rates at large, but rather to consider the adequacy of state assurances that "the methods and standards used by the [State] to set payment rates [are] consistent with 45…”
Babbitt v. State of Mich., 778 F. Supp. 941 (W.D. Mich. 1991). “” 45 C.F.R. § 201.2 . Plaintiffs allege that the reductions in benefits implemented by the State of Michigan are a violation of the Social Security Act because the state is no longer in compliance with its approved state plan and because the reductions are below the allegedly…”
Callahan v. Woods, 736 F.2d 1269 (9th Cir. 1984). “§ 602 (b); 45 C.F.R. § 201.2 . Section 602(a)(25), added in 1974, provides: (A) that, as a condition of eligibility under the plan, each applicant for or recipient of aid shall furnish to the State agency his social security account number (or numbers, if he has more than one…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.