45 C.F.R. § 205.35

Mechanized claims processing and information retrieval systems; definitions

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 205.35 through 205.38 contain State plan requirements for an automated statewide management information system, conditions for FFP and responsibilities of the Administration for Children and Families (ACF). For purposes of §§ 205.35 through 205.38:

(a) A mechanized claims processing and information retrieval system, hereafter referred to as an automated application processing and information retrieval system (APIRS), or the system, means a system of software and hardware used:

(1) To introduce, control and account for data items in providing public assistance under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC) State plan; and

(2) To retrieve and produce utilization and management information about such aid and services as required by the single State agency and Federal government for program administration and audit purposes.

(b) Planning means:

(1) The preliminary project activity to determine the requirements necessitating the project, the activities to be undertaken, and the resources required to complete the project;

(2) The preparation of an APD;

(3) The preparation of a detailed project plan describing when and how the computer system will be designed and developed; and

(4) The preparation of a detailed implementation plan describing specific training, testing, and conversion plans to install the computer system.

Annually updated advance automatic data processing planning document;

Design or System Design;

Development;

Initial advance automatic data processing planning document;

Installation;

Operation; and

Software.

[51 FR 45330, Dec. 18, 1986, as amended at 53 FR 36579, Sept. 21, 1988; 55 FR 4379, Feb. 7, 1990; 59 FR 30708, June 15, 1994]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1974–1979 · leading case: Relf v. Weinberger, 372 F. Supp. 1196 (D.D.C. 1974).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Relf v. Weinberger, 372 F. Supp. 1196 (D.D.C. 1974). · cites it 5× “-202(f); 45 CFR § 205.35 (a)(2) (ii). (2) Legally competent persons under the age of 18 must also give such written consent.”

Rush v. Parham, 440 F. Supp. 383 (N.D. Ga. 1977). “30 (b)(3), sterilization prerequisites, 45 C.F.R. § 205.35 ; future utilization review 45 C.”

Sewickley Valley Hosp. v. Commonwealth, 409 A.2d 496 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979). “…withdraw his consent, was incomplete in addition to which the signature of the physician or his designee was undated. 45 C.F.R. §205.35 (a) (2) (i).”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.