45 C.F.R. § 233.110
Foster care maintenance and adoption assistance
(a) State plan requirements. A State plan under title IV-A of the Social Security Act must provide that the State has in effect a plan approved under part E, title IV of the Social Security Act, and operates a foster care maintenance and adoption assistance program in conformity with such a plan.
(b) [Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 1979–1994 · leading case: Miller v. Youakim, 440 U.S. 125 (1979).
Miller v. Youakim, 440 U.S. 125 (1979). “udgment was pending in this Court, the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW) issued a formal interpretation of the scope of the federal AFDC-FC program, providing in pertinent part: “When a child has been removed from his home by judicial determination and is placed…”
Feeling v. Kelly, 152 F.R.D. 670 (D.D.C. 1994). “” See 45 C.F.R. § 233.110 (a)(5). The States have been left the task of defining “forthwith”.”
Pease v. Dir. of Michigan Dep't of Soc. Servs., 308 N.W.2d 432 (Mich. Ct. App. 1981). “The Michigan transfer-of-assets provision is within each of these areas of state concern since it constitutes a device for controlling the allocation of funds and denies benefits only to persons who have transferred assets in order to remain eligible for benefits, which…”
Craven v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 347 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “Further, the eligibility requirements are provided in 45 CFR 233.110 and the state plan adopted by the State of Michigan.”
Montgomery v. Blum, 112 Misc. 2d 190 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1982). “The Federal regulation is similar (45 CFR 233.110). Clearly, the New York regulation governing eligibility is contrary to the Federal law (US Code, tit 42, § 608).”
Romero v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 425 N.W.2d 570 (Mich. Ct. App. 1988). “45 CFR 233.110; Pease, supra. We are persuaded that Item 322 advances the legitimate purpose of reducing the possibility of fraudulent, collusive or unscrupulous conduct by afdc recipients and responsible relatives.”
— 45 C.F.R. § 233.110(a)(l)(iii) — 1 case
Craven v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 347 N.W.2d 782 (Mich. Ct. App. 1984). “Further, the eligibility requirements are provided in 45 CFR 233.110 and the state plan adopted by the State of Michigan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.