C.F.R. » Title 45 » CHAPTER III—OFFICE OF CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES, ADMINISTRATION OF FAMILIES AND SERVICES, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES › PART 302—STATE PLAN REQUIREMENTS

45 C.F.R. § 302.10

Statewide operations

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The State plan shall provide that:

(a) It will be in operation on a statewide basis in accordance with equitable standards for administration that are mandatory throughout the State;

(b) If administered by a political subdivision of the State, the plan will be mandatory on such political subdivision;

(c) The IV-D agency will assure that the plan is continuously in operation in all appropriate offices or agencies through:

(1) Methods for informing staff of State policies, standards, procedures and instructions; and

(2) Regular planned examination and evaluation of operations in local offices by regularly assigned State staff, including regular visits by such staff; and through reports, controls, or other necessary methods.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1987–2002 · leading case: Jackson Cnty. Ex Rel. Child Support Enf't Agency v. Swayney, 352 S.E.2d 413 (N.C. 1987).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jackson Cnty. Ex Rel. Child Support Enf't Agency v. Swayney, 352 S.E.2d 413 (N.C. 1987). “45 C.F.R. 302.10(a). However, the Court of Indian Offenses is an entity created and regulated by the federal government.”
White v. Davis, 133 Cal. Rptr. 2d 691 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). “” ( 45 C.F.R. § 302.10 (c) (2001), italics added.”
Jackson Cnty. Ex Rel. Child Support Enf't Agency Ex Rel. Smoker v. Smoker, 445 S.E.2d 408 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). “2d at 418 ; 45 C.F.R. 302.10(a) (1993). The Swayney Court questioned whether reliance upon tribal courts would satisfy this requirement, and noted that failure to comply with the requirements of the AFDC program could result in a loss of federal funding.”
White v. Davis, 37 P.3d 647 (Cal. Ct. App. 2002). “" ( 45 C.F.R. § 302.10 (c), italics added.) Moreover, these regulations set timeframes for the collection and disbursement of funds by the state agency ( 45 C.”
Davis v. Eubanks & DHS, 40 S.W.3d 24 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). “The proposed regulations apparently require 100% compliance in only the following areas: statewide operations ( 45 C.F.R. § 302.10 ); reports and maintenance of records ( 45 C.”
State Dept. of Soc. Servs. v. Cw, 815 So. 2d 241 (La. Ct. App. 2002). “NOTES [1] Now see 45 C.F.R. § 302.10 and § 302.12. [2] Subsection A requires that 75% of the support enforcement cases must be brought to disposition within six months from the time of service and 90% of the cases must be brought to disposition within twelve months.”
— 45 C.F.R. § 302.10(a) — 2 cases
Jackson Cnty. Ex Rel. Child Support Enf't Agency v. Swayney, 352 S.E.2d 413 (N.C. 1987). “45 C.F.R. 302.10(a). However, the Court of Indian Offenses is an entity created and regulated by the federal government.”
Jackson Cnty. Ex Rel. Child Support Enf't Agency Ex Rel. Smoker v. Smoker, 445 S.E.2d 408 (N.C. Ct. App. 1994). “2d at 418 ; 45 C.F.R. 302.10(a) (1993). The Swayney Court questioned whether reliance upon tribal courts would satisfy this requirement, and noted that failure to comply with the requirements of the AFDC program could result in a loss of federal funding.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.