45 C.F.R. § 303.109

Procedures for State monitoring, evaluation and reporting on programs funded by Grants to States for Access and Visitation Programs

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Monitoring. The State must monitor all programs funded under Grants to States for Access and Visitation Programs to ensure that the programs are providing services authorized in section 469B(a) of the Act, are being conducted in an effective and efficient manner, are complying with Federal evaluation and reporting requirements, and contain safeguards to insure the safety of parents and children.

(b) Evaluation. The State:

(1) May evaluate all programs funded under Grants to States for Access and Visitation Programs;

(2) Must assist in the evaluation of significant or promising projects as determined by the Secretary;

(1) Report a detailed description of each program funded, providing the following information, as appropriate: service providers and administrators, service area (rural/urban), population served (income, race, marital status), program goals, application or referral process (including referral sources), voluntary or mandatory nature of the programs, types of activities, and length and features of a completed program;

(2) Report data including: the number of applicants/referrals for each program, the total number of participating individuals, and the number of persons who have completed program requirements by authorized activities (mediation—voluntary and mandatory, counseling, education, development of parenting plans, visitation enforcement—including monitoring, supervision and neutral drop-off and pickup) and development of guidelines for visitation and alternative custody arrangements; and

(3) Report the information required in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this section annually, at such time, and in such form, as the Secretary may require.

[64 FR 15136, Mar. 30, 1999]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 2020–2020 · leading case: in the Interest of Z.O.M. & K.R.M., Child. (Tex. App. 2020).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

in the Interest of Z.O.M. & K.R.M., Child. (Tex. App. 2020). “31, 1998), 1998 WL 140546 (codified at 45 C.F.R. § 303.109 ). 5 The “Title IV-D agency” must be the entity providing services, but when the DRO is providing Title IV-D services, the DRO is considered the Title IV-D agency.”

in the Interest of Z.O.M. & K.R.M., Child. (Tex. App. 2020). “31, 1998), 1998 WL 140546 (codified at 45 C.F.R. § 303.109 ). “Consistent with federal law,” Texas has also authorized the Office of the Attorney General (OAG), Texas’s Title IV-D agency, to execute governor-approved agreements with other governmental entities “to enforce an…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.