45 C.F.R. § 46.123

Early termination of research support: Evaluation of applications and proposals

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The department or agency head may require that Federal department or agency support for any project be terminated or suspended in the manner prescribed in applicable program requirements, when the department or agency head finds an institution has materially failed to comply with the terms of this policy.

(b) In making decisions about supporting or approving applications or proposals covered by this policy the department or agency head may take into account, in addition to all other eligibility requirements and program criteria, factors such as whether the applicant has been subject to a termination or suspension under paragraph (a) of this section and whether the applicant or the person or persons who would direct or has/have directed the scientific and technical aspects of an activity has/have, in the judgment of the department or agency head, materially failed to discharge responsibility for the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects (whether or not the research was subject to federal regulation).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2002–2002 · leading case: Wright v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Rsch. Ctr., 269 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (W.D. Wash. 2002).
Wright v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Rsch. Ctr., 269 F. Supp. 2d 1286 (W.D. Wash. 2002). “See 45 C.F.R. § 46.123 . Such regulations are not concerned with “whether the needs of any particular person have been satisfied” and they do not, therefore, give rise *1290 to an individual right.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.