The purpose of this part is to effectuate the provisions of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (hereafter referred to as the “Act”) to the end that no person in the United States shall; on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services.
(Sec. 601, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252 (42 U.S.C. 2000d))
[29 FR 16298, Dec. 4, 1964, as amended at 38 FR 17982, July 5, 1973]
Notes of Decisions
Brown v. Weinberger, 417 F. Supp. 1215 (D.D.C. 1976).
“In accordance with this section of the statute, HEW has promulgated regulations for effectuating Title VI and for enforcing nondiscrimination under programs receiving Federal financial assistance through HEW at 45 CFR § 80.1 et seq. More specifically, for purposes of this case,…”
Bryan v. Koch, 492 F. Supp. 212 (S.D.N.Y. 1980).
“” 45 C.F.R. § 80.1 (b)(l)(iv) and (b)(l)(vi).”
Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Mathews, 562 F.2d 914 (4th Cir. 1977).
“” 45 C.F.R. § 80.1 (emphasis added). The compliance section of Title VI and its parallel regulation similarly require voluntary compliance by the parties in an effort to end discrimination in programs receiving federal funding, and failing in that, termination provisions for…”
Brown v. Califano, 455 F. Supp. 837 (D.D.C. 1978).
“See 45 C.F.R. §§ 80.1 -.13 (1977). In addition, “Compliance with any requirement adopted pursuant to this section may be effected by (1) termination of” the government funding “or (2) by any other means authorized by law.”
Caulfield v. Bd. of Educ., 632 F.2d 999 (2d Cir. 1980).
“The Title VI regulations are in 45 C.F.R. §§ 80.1 -.13 (1979); the Title IX regulations are in 45 C.”
Ames v. Prisma Health, No. 3:20-cv-03594 (D.S.C. May 19, 2021).
“” 45 C.F.R. Part 80.1. Ames maintains, however, that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over her federal claim.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.