C.F.R. » Title 45 » SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL ADMINISTRATION › PART 80—NONDISCRIMINATION UNDER PROGRAMS RECEIVING FEDERAL ASSISTANCE THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES EFFECTUATION OF TITLE VI OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964

45 C.F.R. § 80.2

Application of this regulation

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

This regulation applies to any program to which Federal financial assistance is authorized to be extended to a recipient under a law administered by the Department, including the Federal financial assistance listed in appendix A to this part. It applies to money paid, property transferred, or other Federal financial assistance extended after the effective date of the regulation pursuant to an application approved prior to such effective date. This regulation does not apply to (a) any Federal financial assistance by way of insurance or guaranty contracts, (b) money paid, property transferred, or other assistance extended before the effective date of this regulation, (c) the use of any assistance by any individual who is the ultimate beneficiary under any such program, or (d) any employment practice, under any such program, or any employer, employment agency, or labor organization, except to the extent described in § 80.3. The fact that a type of Federal assistance is not listed in appendix A to this part shall not mean, if title VI of the Act is otherwise applicable, that a program is not covered. Federal financial assistance under statutes now in force or hereinafter enacted may be added to this list by notice published in the Federal Register.

(Secs. 602, 604, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 78 Stat. 252, 253 (42 U.S.C. 2000d-1, 2000d-3)) [38 FR 17979, July 5, 1973, as amended at 70 FR 24318, May 9, 2005]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1969–1996 · leading case: Board of Public Instruction of Taylor County, Florida v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Board of Public Instruction of Taylor County, Florida v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare (1969) ca5 “See 45 C.F.R. § 80.2 and 45 C.F.R. § 80.13 , Appendix A.”
Madison-Hughes v. Shalala (1996) ca6 “” 45 C.F.R. §80.2 . Because HHS is a federal agency which provides financial assistance through the Medicare and Medicaid programs, it must comply with Title VI.”
Hillsdale College v. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1982) ca6 “Senator Eastland went so far as to introduce in the Congressional Record a long list of the federal programs to which the cutoff provision was applicable, 110 Cong. Rec. 8359-8361 (1964), as did Congressmen Poff and Cramer in the House.”
Mayor & City Council of Baltimore v. Mathews (1977) ca4 · cites it 2× “45 C.F.R. § 80.2 . The regulation also enumerates proscribed acts of discrimination, requires assurances of equal treatment before any grant is awarded, and gives illustrative examples of how certain deficient programs can be corrected and brought into compliance with the…”
Bryan v. Koch (1980) ca2 “45 C.F.R. § 80.2 . . The Court also held that private parties may bring suit to compel compliance with the regulations.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.