C.F.R. » Title 45 » SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL ADMINISTRATION › PART 88—ENSURING THAT DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES FUNDS DO NOT SUPPORT COERCIVE OR DISCIMINATORY POLICIES OR PRACTICES IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW

45 C.F.R. § 88.1

Purpose

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The purpose of this part is to provide for the enforcement of the Church Amendments, 42 U.S.C. 300a-7; the Coats-Snowe Amendment, section 245 of the Public Health Service Act, 42 U.S.C. 238n; the Weldon Amendment, e.g., Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law 117-328, div. H, title V General Provisions, section 507(d)(1) (Dec. 29, 2022); Sections 1303(b)(1)(A), (b)(4), and (c)(2)(A), and 1411(b)(5)(A), and 1553 of the ACA, 42 U.S.C. 18023(b)(1)(A), (b)(4), and (c)(2)(A), 18081(b)(5)(A), and 18113; certain Medicare and Medicaid provisions, 42 U.S.C. 1320a-1(h), 1320c-11, 1395i-5, 1395w-22(j)(3)(B), 1395x(e), 1395x(y)(1), 1395cc(f), 1396a(a), 1396a(w)(3), 1396u-2(b)(3)(B), 1397j-1(b), and 14406; the Helms, Biden, 1978, and 1985 Amendments, 22 U.S.C. 2151b(f), accord, e.g., Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2023, Public Law 117-328, div. K, title VII, section 7018 (Dec. 29, 2022); 22 U.S.C. 7631(d); 42 U.S.C. 280g-1(d), 290bb-36(f), 1396f, 1396s(c)(2)(B)(ii); 5106i(a)); and 29 U.S.C. 669(a)(5), referred to collectively as the “Federal health care conscience protection statutes.”

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2010–2015 · leading case: Lurie v. Mid-Atl. Permanente Med. Grp., P.C., 729 F. Supp. 2d 304 (D.D.C. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Lurie v. Mid-Atl. Permanente Med. Grp., P.C., 729 F. Supp. 2d 304 (D.D.C. 2010). “See 45 C.F.R. § 88.1 . Plaintiff has not alleged that defendant is a recipient of such funds.”
Hellwege v. Tampa Fam. Health Centers, 103 F. Supp. 3d 1303 (M.D. Fla. 2015). “Specifically, 45 C.F.R. § 88.1 states that “[t]he purpose of this part is to provide for the enforcement of the Church Amendments.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.