47 C.F.R. § 64.702
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29
cases, 1973–2019 · leading case: Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 290 F. Supp. 2d 993 (D. Minnesota 2003).
Vonage Holdings Corp. v. Minnesota Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 290 F. Supp. 2d 993 (D. Minnesota 2003). “47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a). Examining the statutory language of the Communications Act, the Court concludes that the VoIP service provided by Vonage constitutes an information service because it offers the “capability for generating, acquiring, storing, transforming, processing,…”
United States v. W. Elec. Co., Inc., 673 F. Supp. 525 (D.D.C. 1987). “" 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (d)(2). That being so, the data communications market will be especially susceptible to discrimination.”
Telecomm. Rsch. & Action Ctr. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 750 F.2d 70 (D.C. Cir. 1984). “"Enhanced services,” as opposed to basic transmission services are those "which employ computer processing applications that act on the format, content, code, protocol or similar aspects of the subscriber’s transmitted information; provide the subscriber additional, different,…”
Mozilla Corp. v. FCC, 940 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “2d at 498; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a).1 In contrast, 1 Note that the definition of “enhanced services” is restricted to services “offered over common carrier transmission.”
Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLC v. Lange, 903 F.3d 715 (8th Cir. 2018). “2007); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 . The FCC has so far declined to classify VoIP services as either information or telecommunications services, despite repeated opportunities to do so.”
Am. Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 454 F.3d 329 (D.C. Cir. 2006). “AT & T’s claim that it relied on the language of the Commission’s “en *333 hanced services” regulation, 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a), rings hollow. 4 The Commission viewed this regulatory definition, crafted before the Telecommunications Act of 1996 created a statutory class of…”
LinkLine Commc'ns, Inc. v. SBC California, Inc., 503 F.3d 876 (9th Cir. 2007). “See 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (c) (codifying the second "Computer Inquiry").”
Saunders v. Dyck O'Neal, Inc., 319 F. Supp. 3d 907 (W.D. Mich. 2018). “Dyck O'Neal argues that because voicemail is an "information or enhanced service," as opposed to a "telecommunications service," it is not regulated under § 227(b)(1)(A)(iii), according to 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a). Dyck O'Neal conflates the issues and attempts to blur the law.”
MCI Telecomm. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n United States of Am., Sprint Commc'ns Co., L.P., Intervenors, 57 F.3d 1136 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “Enhanced Service Providers The Commission defines enhanced services as services, offered over common carrier transmission facilities used in interstate commerce, which employ computer processing applications that act on the format, content, code, protocol or similar aspects of…”
Prodigy Servs. Corp., Inc. v. Johnson, 125 S.W.3d 413 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003). “at 387; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a)(1989). Database services, in which a customer dials a number to obtain access to stored information, such as Dow Jones News, Lexis, and “Dial It” sports scores, are examples of enhanced services.”
Howard v. Am. Online Inc., 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000). “2d 384 , 417-23, 0080 WL 233301 (1980) (final decision); 47 C.F.R. 64.702(a) (“[EJnhanced service shall refer to services .”
Global NAPs California, Inc. v. Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 624 F.3d 1225 (9th Cir. 2010). “” Under this exemption, telecommunications providers offering services that use “computer processing applications that act on the format, content, code, protocol or similar aspects of the subscriber’s transmitted information; provide the subscriber additional, different, or…”
Charter Advanced Servs. (MN), LLC v. Lange, 259 F. Supp. 3d 980 (D. Minnesota 2017). “47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a). For calls originating with one of Vonage’s customers, calls in the VoIP format must be transformed into the format of the PSTN before a POTS [Plain Old Telephone Service] user can receive the call.”
Frontier Tel. of Rochester, Inc. v. USA Datanet Corp., 386 F. Supp. 2d 144 (W.D.N.Y. 2005). “94 , 2004 WL 439260 (Citing 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a)). On the other hand, the FCC, for policy reasons, has declined to regard as enhanced some services that arguably fit within this definition.”
Bell Atl. Tel. Companies v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 206 F.3d 1 (D.C. Cir. 2000). “…additional, different, or restructured information; or involve subscriber interaction with stored information.” 47 CFR § 64.702 (a).”
U S West Commc'ns, Inc. v. Hix, 183 F. Supp. 2d 1249 (D. Colo. 2000). “§§ 153 (20) and (43), and the FCC has expressly stated that all services previously considered to be “enhanced services” are “information services” under the Act.”
GTE Serv. Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 474 F.2d 724 (2d Cir. 1973). “2d 267 (1971)) of the Federal Communications Commission which promulgated certain rules ( 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (Supp.1972)) relating to the rendition of computer data processing services by communications common carriers.”
Int'l Bus. Machines Corp. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 570 F.2d 452 (2d Cir. 1978). “” 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a)(1) (emphasis supplied).”
Mostly Media, Inc. v. U.S. West Commc'ns, 186 F.3d 864 (8th Cir. 1999). “See 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (1998). Mostly Media also claims that U.”
Michigan Bell Commc'ns, Inc v. Michigan Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 399 N.W.2d 49 (Mich. Ct. App. 1986). “The federal rulings were followed by FCC Rule, 47 CFR § 64.702 (d): A carrier subject to the proscription set forth in paragraph (c) of this section: (4) Must obtain Commission approval as to the manner in which the separate corporation is to be capitalized, prior to obtaining…”
Illinois Bell Tel. Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 740 F.2d 465 (7th Cir. 1984). “(The requirements for a separate subsidiary, as they will be applicable to the divested companies under the order reviewed here, are set forth at 47 C.F.R. §§ 64.702 (c), (d).) Before the new subsidiary could be formed, AT & T, after a year of trial of the Justice Department’s…”
SPRINT INTERN. v. Dep't of Revenue, 226 P.3d 253 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “2d 384 , ¶ 281 (1980) (amending 47 C.F.R. 64.702). Enhanced services are "[transmission] services .”
Sprint Int'l Commc'ns Corp. v. Dep't of Revenue, 154 Wash. App. 926 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “2d 384 , ¶ 281 (1980) (amending 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 ). “Enhanced services” are “[transmission] services which employ computer processing applications that act on the format, content, code, protocol or similar aspects of the subscriber’s transmitted information .”
AT&T Corp. v. City of Portland, 216 F.3d 871 (9th Cir. 2000). “2000); see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a); California v. FCC, 905 F.”
Mostly Media, Inc., a Nebraska Corp. Pixel Image Transformatte Inc., a Nebraska Corp. & Imageware, Inc., a Nebraska Corp.,doing Bus. as Cottonwood Commc'ns, Inc. v. U.S. West Commc'ns U.S. Mktg. Resources Grp., Inc., on Doing Bus. as U.S. West Direct U.S. West U.S. West Commc'ns Grp., Inc. Interactive Video .Enter., Inc. U.S. West Interactive Servs., Inc. U.S. West Multimedia Commc'ns, Inc. U.S. West Multimedia Servs. Grp., Inc. U.S. West Advanced Tech., Inc. U.S. West Bus. Resources, Inc., Colorado Corporations U.S. West Enhanced Servs., Inc., a Washington Corp. & U.S. West Multimediaservices of Omaha, Inc., 186 F.3d 864 (8th Cir. 1999). “See 47 C.F.R. 64.702 (1998). Mostly Media also claims that U.”
No. 98-56138, 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000). “2d 384 , 417-23 (1980) (final decision); 47 C.F.R. 64.702(a) ("[E]nhanced service shall refer to services .”
Mozilla Corp. v. FCC (D.C. Cir. 2019). “2d at 498; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a).1 In contrast, 1 Note that the definition of “enhanced services” is restricted to services “offered over common carrier transmission.”
Level 3 Commc'ns, LLC v. Richard Roberts, Comm'r of Revenue, State of Tennessee (Tenn. Ct. App. 2013). “at 387 ; see also 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (a)(1989). Database services, in which a customer dials a number to obtain access to stored information, such as Dow Jones News, Lexis, and “Dial It” sports scores, are examples of enhanced services.”
Linkline v. Sbc California, Inc. (9th Cir. 2007). “See 47 C.F.R. § 64.702 (c) (codifying the second “Com- puter Inquiry”).”
— 47 C.F.R. § 64.702(a) — 2 cases
Howard v. Am. Online Inc., 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000). “2d 384 , 417-23, 0080 WL 233301 (1980) (final decision); 47 C.F.R. 64.702(a) (“[EJnhanced service shall refer to services .”
No. 98-56138, 208 F.3d 741 (9th Cir. 2000). “2d 384 , 417-23 (1980) (final decision); 47 C.F.R. 64.702(a) ("[E]nhanced service shall refer to services .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.