47 C.F.R. § 73.3534
[Reserved]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases, 1987–1995 · leading case: New Orleans Channel 20, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 830 F.2d 361 (D.C. Cir. 1987).
New Orleans Channel 20, Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 830 F.2d 361 (D.C. Cir. 1987). “47 C.F.R. § 73.3534 (1985). Appellants do not contest this finding.”
Miami Mds Co. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, 14 F.3d 658 (D.C. Cir. 1994). “4, which must occur at least 30 days before expiration, see 47 CFR § 73.3534 . The Commission’s object was to warn per-mittees that they could not halt their efforts at due diligence merely on the filing of such an application, 19 F.”
Press Broad. Co., Inc. v. Fed. Commc'ns Comm'n, Rainbow Broad., Ltd., Intervenor, 59 F.3d 1365 (D.C. Cir. 1995). “3598 and thus did not need to make the showings ordinarily required of applicants by its regulation governing permit extensions, 47 C.F.R. § 73.3534 . 9 F.C.C.R. at 2846.”
Barnstead Broad. Corp. v. Offshore Broad. Corp., 886 F. Supp. 874 (D.D.C. 1995). “Furthermore, while it is asserted that FCC staff told both parties that extensions and assignments of the construction permits would be prohibited, these informal statements by FCC staff do not have legal consequences.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.