48 C.F.R. § 1.101
1.101 Purpose.
The Federal Acquisition Regulations System is established for the codification and publication of uniform policies and procedures for acquisition by all executive agencies. The Federal Acquisition Regulations System consists of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which is the primary document, and agency acquisition regulations that implement or supplement the FAR. The FAR System does not include internal agency guidance of the type described in 1.301(a)(2).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 35
cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1990–2025 · leading case: Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. Ecc Centcom Constructors LLC
Aspic Eng'g & Constr. v. Ecc Centcom Constructors LLC, 913 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2019). “See 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 (“The [FAR] System is established for the codification and publication of uniform policies and procedures for acquisition by all executive agencies.”
Acha v. Dep't of Agric., 841 F.3d 878 (10th Cir. 2016). “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 . In January 2012, a few months, into his job, Petitioner submitted a report to his direct supervisor that documented an apartment rental he had helped secure on behalf of the Forest Service.”
Tyler v. U.S. Dep't of Educ. Rehab. Servs. Admin., 904 F.3d 1167 (10th Cir. 2018). “" 48 C.F.R. §§ 1.101 , 1.103. Under the regulations, "[a]cquisition means the acquiring by contract with appropriated funds of supplies or services .”
Irvin Indus. Canada, Ltd. v. United States Air Force, 924 F.2d 1068 (D.C. Cir. 1990). “48 C.F.R. § 1.101 (1989). The system consists of the Federal Acquisition Regulation, which is the primary document, and agency acquisition regulations implementing or supplementing it.”
Medco Behavioral Care Corp. of Iowa v. State Dep't of Human Servs., 553 N.W.2d 556 (Iowa 1996). “48 C.F.R. § 1.101 ; see also id. at § 9.502(b) (applicability of this regulation not limited to any particular type of acquisition).”
Abatement Contracting Corp. v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 594 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “Federal Acquisition Regulations ("FAR”) are contained in 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 et seq. . While plaintiff’s bid was $818,466.”
Davies Precision Machining, Inc. v. United States, 35 Fed. Cl. 651 (Fed. Cl. 1996). “48 C.F.R. § 1.101 . Agency heads may issue or authorize the issuance of acquisition regulations that implement or supplement the FAR.”
Gaines v. Dist. of Columbia, 961 F. Supp. 2d 218 (D.D.C. 2013). “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 . The FAR applies to “acquisitions,” which in the context of the FAR means “the acquiring by contract with appropriated funds of supplies or services (including construction) by and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase or lease.”
ATK Thiokol, Inc. v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 612 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 . Sub-part 31.2 of the FAR govern the allowability of costs after costs have been allocated to a contract, as required by the CAS.”
Applications Rsch. Corp. v. Naval Air Dev. Ctr., 752 F. Supp. 660 (E.D. Pa. 1990). “K at 43; see also 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 (“The Federal Acquisition Regulations System is established for the codification and publication of uniform policies and procedures for acquisition by all executive agencies.”
Chamber of Com. of the United States v. Napolitano, 648 F. Supp. 2d 726 (D. Maryland 2009). “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 . Among other things, the FAR contains standard contract provisions that must be used by federal contracting officers.”
Baragona v. Kuwait & Gulf Link Transp. Co., 691 F. Supp. 2d 1351 (N.D. Ga. 2009). “20, 2009) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 1.101 ). 17 . Even if it were to pass, several provisions of the bill provide that it does not apply retroactively.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.