48 C.F.R. § 1.104
1.104 Applicability.
The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 95 N.E.3d 547 (Mass. 2018).
A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 95 N.E.3d 547 (Mass. 2018). “See 48 C.F.R. §§ 1.104 , 2.101. As a result, for example, the contract here allows the MBTA to terminate "in its sole discretion," and "for any reason," rather than allowing termination only where the termination is "in the Government's interest.”
Am. Saf. Council, Inc. v. United States, 122 Fed. Cl. 426 (Fed. Cl. 2015). “See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 (emphasis added) (“The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
United States v. Renda Marine, Inc., 667 F.3d 651 (5th Cir. 2012). “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . 4 . Edmier involved an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals.”
Brent Berry v. Native Am. Servs. Corp., 109 F.4th 1297 (11th Cir. 2024). “See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Like the SBA reg- ulatory provisions, one provision in the FAR requires 8(a) contracts to be “terminated for convenience if the 8(a) contractor to which it was awarded transfers ownership or control of the firm .”
Gov't Servs. Corp. v. United States, 131 Fed. Cl. 409 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “§ 3729 ); Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) 48 C.F.R §§ 1.104, 2.101, 12.604(c), 14.208(a), 14.”
United States Ex Rel. Gage v. Davis S.R. Aviation, L.L.C., 623 F. App'x 622 (5th Cir. 2015). “See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 (“The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
Ingham Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. United States, 126 Fed. Cl. 1 (Fed. Cl. 2016). “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 (2010). As plaintiffs note, the FAR defines “Acquisition,” (emphasis in original) as “the acquiring by contract with appropriated funds of supplies or services (including construction) by and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase or lease,…”
Stevens Aviation, Inc. v. Dyncorp Int'l LLC, 715 S.E.2d 655 (S.C. Ct. App. 2011). “See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 ("The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in Part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
Pacord, Inc. v. United States of Am. a & E Indus., Inc., 139 F.3d 1320 (9th Cir. 1998). “” 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Section 2.101 defines “acquisition” as “the acquiring by contract .”
Winterbottom v. Underriner (D. Haw. 2019). “See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Section 1.602-1, provides that “[n]o contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met.”
Winterbottom v. Underriner (D. Haw. 2019). “See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Section 1.602-1 provides that “[n]o contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met.”
Nat'l Fed'n of the Blind v. U.S. AbilityOne Comm'n (D. Maryland 2019). “Explaining the FAR’s scope, 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 provides that “[t]he FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.