48 C.F.R. § 1.104
1.104 Applicability.
The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 16
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1998–2025 · leading case: A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transportation Authority
A.L. Prime Energy Consultant, Inc. v. Mass. Bay Transportation Authority (2018)
“See 48 C.F.R. §§ 1.104 , 2.101. As a result, for example, the contract here allows the MBTA to terminate "in its sole discretion," and "for any reason," rather than allowing termination only where the termination is "in the Government's interest.”
American Safety Council, Inc. v. United States (2015)
“See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 (emphasis added) (“The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
United States v. Renda Marine, Inc. (2012)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . 4 . Edmier involved an appeal to the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals.”
Brent Berry v. Native American Services Corporation (2024)
“See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Like the SBA reg- ulatory provisions, one provision in the FAR requires 8(a) contracts to be “terminated for convenience if the 8(a) contractor to which it was awarded transfers ownership or control of the firm .”
Government Services Corp. v. United States (2017)
“§ 3729 ); Federal Acquisition Regulation (“FAR”) 48 C.F.R §§ 1.104, 2.101, 12.604(c), 14.208(a), 14.”
United States Ex Rel. Gage v. Davis S.R. Aviation, L.L.C. (2015)
“See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 (“The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United States (2016)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 (2010). As plaintiffs note, the FAR defines “Acquisition,” (emphasis in original) as “the acquiring by contract with appropriated funds of supplies or services (including construction) by and for the use of the Federal Government through purchase or lease,…”
Stevens Aviation, Inc. v. Dyncorp International LLC (2011)
“See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 ("The FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in Part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
Pacord, Inc. v. United States of America a & E Industries, Inc. (1998)
“” 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Section 2.101 defines “acquisition” as “the acquiring by contract .”
Winterbottom v. Underriner (2019)
“See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Section 1.602-1, provides that “[n]o contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met.”
Winterbottom v. Underriner (2019)
“See 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 . Section 1.602-1 provides that “[n]o contract shall be entered into unless the contracting officer ensures that all requirements of law, executive orders, regulations, and all other applicable procedures, including clearances and approvals, have been met.”
National Federation of the Blind v. U.S. AbilityOne Commission (2019)
“Explaining the FAR’s scope, 48 C.F.R. § 1.104 provides that “[t]he FAR applies to all acquisitions as defined in part 2 of the FAR, except where expressly excluded.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.