48 C.F.R. § 1.108

1.108 FAR conventions.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

The following conventions provide guidance for interpreting the FAR:

(a) Words and terms. Definitions in Part 2 apply to the entire regulation unless specifically defined in another part, subpart, section, provision, or clause. Words or terms defined in a specific part, subpart, section, provision, or clause have that meaning when used in that part, subpart, section, provision, or clause. Undefined words retain their common dictionary meaning.

(b) Delegation of authority. Each authority is delegable unless specifically stated otherwise (see 1.102-5(b)).

(c) Dollar thresholds. Unless otherwise specified, a specific dollar threshold for the purpose of applicability is the final anticipated dollar value of the action, including the dollar value of all options. If the action establishes a maximum quantity of supplies or services to be acquired or establishes a ceiling price or establishes the final price to be based on future events, the final anticipated dollar value must be the highest final priced alternative to the Government, including the dollar value of all options.

(d) Application of FAR changes to solicitations and contracts. Unless otherwise specified—

(1) FAR changes apply to solicitations issued on or after the effective date of the change;

(2) Contracting officers may, at their discretion, include the FAR changes in solicitations issued before the effective date, provided award of the resulting contract(s) occurs on or after the effective date; and

(3) Contracting officers may, at their discretion, include the changes in any existing contract with appropriate consideration.

(e) Citations. When the FAR cites a statute, Executive order, Office of Management and Budget circular, Office of Federal Procurement Policy policy letter, or relevant portion of the Code of Federal Regulations, the citation includes all applicable amendments, unless otherwise stated.

(f) Imperative sentences. When an imperative sentence directs action, the contracting officer is responsible for the action, unless another party is expressly cited.

[65 FR 36015, June 6, 2000, as amended at 88 FR 53751, Aug. 8, 2023]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2008–2017 · leading case: Call Henry, Inc. v. United States
Call Henry, Inc. v. United States (2017) cafc “Because this contract was entered into on April 23, 2003, the contract is governed by the FAR provisions and clauses that were in effect on that date.”
United States Ex Rel. Keaveney v. SRA International, Inc. (2016) dcd “35 at 15; see also 48 C.F.R. § 1.108 (d)(“FAR changes apply to solicitations issued on or after the effective date of the change.”
Information Sciences Corp. v. United States (2008) uscfc “at 17 (emphasis added) (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 1.108 (f)). 3. The Government’s Reply.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.