C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER C—CONTRACTING METHODS AND CONTRACT TYPES › PART 15—CONTRACTING BY NEGOTIATION › Subpart 15.5—Preaward, Award, and Postaward Notifications, Protests, and Mistakes

48 C.F.R. § 15.507

15.507 Protests against award.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Protests against award in negotiated acquisitions shall be handled in accordance with part 33. Use of agency protest procedures that incorporate the alternative dispute resolution provisions of Executive Order 12979 is encouraged for both preaward and postaward protests.

(b) If a protest causes the agency, within 1 year of contract award, to—

(1) Issue a new solicitation on the protested contract award, the contracting officer shall provide the information in paragraph (c) of this section to all prospective offerors for the new solicitation; or

(2) Issue a new request for revised proposals on the protested contract award, the contracting officer shall provide the information in paragraph (c) of this section to offerors that were in the competitive range and are requested to submit revised proposals.

(c) The following information will be provided to appropriate parties:

(1) Information provided to unsuccessful offerors in any debriefings conducted on the original award regarding the successful offeror's proposal; and

(2) Other nonproprietary information that would have been provided to the original offerors.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2020 · leading case: DGS Contract Serv., Inc. v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 227 (Fed. Cl. 1999).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
DGS Contract Serv., Inc. v. United States, 43 Fed. Cl. 227 (Fed. Cl. 1999). · cites it 7× “Moreover, plaintiff contends this information may not be disclosed under 48 C.F.R. § 15.507 (1998), because that provision only permits the disclosure of debriefing information relating to the successful offeror’s proposals.”
Mantech Telecomm. & Info. Sys. Corp. v. United States, 49 Fed. Cl. 57 (Fed. Cl. 2001). · cites it 2× “Defendant argues that the exchange of information is required by 48 C.F.R. § 15.507 . Paragraph (b) and subparagraph (2) of that section indicates that .”
Inserso Corp. v. United States, 961 F.3d 1343 (Fed. Cir. 2020). “48 C.F.R. § 15.507 . In- serso is now seeking the relief it could have gotten from DISA earlier, before DISA had already expended consider- able time and effort evaluating the bidders’ proposals.”
Aerolease Long Beach v. United States, 31 Fed. Cl. 342 (Fed. Cl. 1994). “507, 48 C.F.R. § 15.507 (1992), the intervenor contends that the contracting officer acted contrary to regulation by accepting an “unsolicited offer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.