48 C.F.R. § 19.1308

19.1308 [Reserved]

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2003–2013 · leading case: Gulf Group Inc. v. United States
Gulf Group Inc. v. United States (2004) uscfc · cites it 3× “” As the provision was printed verbatim, as required by 48 C.F.R. § 19.1308 (b) and § 52.104, 9 it also included the following: A concern that is both a HUBZone small business concern and a small disadvantaged business concern will receive the benefit of both the HUBZone small…”
John Miller, Jr. v. Hillary Clinton (2012) cadc · cites it 2× “, 48 C.F.R. § 19.1308 (establishing “[p]erformance of work requirements” relating to subcontracting); id.”
Delaney Construction Corp. v. United States (2003) uscfc “A regulation, 48 C.F.R. § 19.1308 (b), 2 provides that the contracting officer shall insert FAR clause 52.”
Aquaterra Contracting, Inc. v. United States (2013) uscfc “219-4, Notice of Price Evaluation Preference for HUBZone Small Business Concerns, as required by 48 C.F.R. § 19.1308 (b) for solicitations conducted using full and open competition.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.