C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 2—DEFENSE ACQUISITION REGULATIONS SYSTEM, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE › SUBCHAPTER A—GENERAL › PART 203—IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES AND PERSONAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST › Subpart 203.9—Whistleblower Protections for Contractor Employees

48 C.F.R. § 203.904

203.904 Procedures for filing complaints.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(1) Any employee of a contractor or subcontractor who believes that he or she has been discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against contrary to the policy in 203.903 may file a complaint with the Inspector General of the Department of Defense.

(2) A complaint may not be brought under this section more than three years after the date on which the alleged reprisal took place.

(3) The complaint shall be signed and shall contain—

(i) The name of the contractor;

(ii) The contract number, if known; if not, a description reasonably sufficient to identify the contract(s) involved;

(iii) The violation of law, rule, or regulation giving rise to the disclosure;

(iv) The nature of the disclosure giving rise to the discriminatory act, including the party to whom the information was disclosed; and

(v) The specific nature and date of the reprisal.

[58 FR 59853, Sept. 30, 2013, as amended at 79 FR 11337, Feb. 28, 2014]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2019–2019 · leading case: Brown v. Jacobs Technology, Inc.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brown v. Jacobs Technology, Inc. (2019) mdd “Under 48 C.F.R. 203.904(3), the federal regulation implementing § 2409, a “complaint shall be signed” and contain: (i) The name of the contractor; (ii) The contract number, if known; if not, a description reasonably sufficient to identify the contract(s) involved; (iii) The…”
— 48 C.F.R. § 203.904(3) — 1 case
Brown v. Jacobs Technology, Inc. (2019) mdd “Under 48 C.F.R. 203.904(3), the federal regulation implementing § 2409, a “complaint shall be signed” and contain: (i) The name of the contractor; (ii) The contract number, if known; if not, a description reasonably sufficient to identify the contract(s) involved; (iii) The…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.