48 C.F.R. § 225.770-2

225.770-2 Prohibition.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Do not acquire items covered by the USML or the 600 series of the CCL, through a contract or subcontract at any tier, from any Communist Chinese military company. This prohibition does not apply to components and parts of covered items unless the components and parts are themselves covered by the USML or the 600 series of the CCL.

[83 FR 66072, Dec. 21, 2018]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2009–2021 · leading case: United States v. Aey, Inc.
United States v. Aey, Inc. (2009) flsd · cites it 3× “48 C.F.R. §§ 225.770-2 , 3. The. DFARS rule also provides that the following clause must be included in solicitations and contracts involving the delivery of items covered by the United States Munitions List: Prohibition On Acquisition of United States Munitions List Items From…”
United States v. Ralph Merrill (2012) ca11 “” 48 C.F.R. § 225.770-2 . The regulation requires every solicitation and contract that involves the delivery of covered munitions to include a clause that provides that “[a]ny supplies or services covered by the United States Munitions List that are delivered under this contract…”
Luokung Technology Corp. v. U.S. Department of Defense (2021) dcd “See 48 C.F.R. § 225.770-2 (“Do not acquire items .”
United States v. Ralph Merrill (2012) ca11 “” 48 C.F.R. § 225.770-2 . The regulation requires every solicitation and contract that involves the delivery of covered munitions to include a clause that provides that “[a]ny supplies or services covered by the United States Munitions List that are delivered under this contract…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.