48 C.F.R. § 25.205

25.205 Postaward determinations.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) If a contractor requests a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute after contract award, the contractor must explain why it could not request the determination before contract award or why the need for such determination otherwise was not reasonably foreseeable. If the contracting officer concludes that the contractor should have made the request before contract award, the contracting officer may deny the request.

(b) The contracting officer must base evaluation of any request for a determination regarding the inapplicability of the Buy American statute made after contract award on information required by paragraphs (c) and (d) of the applicable clause at 52.225-9 or 52.225-11 and/or other readily available information.

(c) If a determination, under 25.202(a), is made after contract award that an exception to the Buy American statute applies, the contracting officer must negotiate adequate consideration and modify the contract to allow use of the foreign construction material. When the basis for the exception is the unreasonable price of a domestic construction material, adequate consideration is at least the differential established in 25.202(a) or in accordance with agency procedures.

[64 FR 72419, Dec. 27, 1999, as amended at 79 FR 24209, Apr. 29, 2014]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1992–1993 · leading case: S.J. Amoroso Constr. Co., Inc. v. United States, 12 F.3d 1072 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
S.J. Amoroso Constr. Co., Inc. v. United States, 12 F.3d 1072 (Fed. Cir. 1993). “” 48 C.F.R. § 25.205 (1983). The procurement regulations that preceded the FAR — the Armed Services Procurement Regulations (ASPR) and the Federal Procurement Regulations (FPR) — similarly required in express terms that every construction contract include a Buy American Act…”
S.J. Amoroso Constr. Co. v. United States, 26 Cl. Ct. 759 (Ct. Cl. 1992). “” 48 C.F.R. 25.205 (FAR) (1983). Pursuant to FAR 52.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.