48 C.F.R. § 28.202

28.202 Acceptability of corporate sureties.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) Corporate sureties offered for bonds furnished with contracts performed in the United States or its outlying areas must appear on the list contained in the Department of the Treasury's Listing of Approved Sureties (Treasury Department Circular 570), “Companies Holding Certificates of Authority as Acceptable Sureties on Federal Bonds and as Acceptable Reinsuring Companies.”

(2) The penal amount of the bond should not exceed the surety's underwriting limit stated in the Treasury Department Circular 570. If the penal amount exceeds the underwriting limit, the bond will be acceptable only if (i) the amount which exceeds the specified limit is coinsured or reinsured and (ii) the amount of coinsurance or reinsurance does not exceed the underwriting limit of each coinsurer or reinsurer.

(3) Coinsurance or reinsurance agreements shall conform to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury) regulations in 31 CFR 223.10 and 223.11. When reinsurance is contemplated, the contracting office generally shall require reinsurance agreements to be executed and submitted with the bonds before making a final determination on the bonds.

(4) When specified in the solicitation, the contracting officer may accept a bond from the direct writing company in satisfaction of the total bond requirement of the contract. This is permissible until necessary reinsurance agreements are executed, even though the total bond requirement may exceed the insurer's underwriting limitation. The contractor shall execute and submit necessary reinsurance agreements to the contracting officer within the time specified on the bid form, which may not exceed 45 calendar days after the execution of the bond. The contractor shall use Standard Form (SF) 273, Reinsurance Agreement for a Bonds Statute Performance Bond, and SF 274, Reinsurance Agreement for a Bonds Statute Payment Bond, when reinsurance is furnished with the required performance or payment bonds. SF 275, Reinsurance Agreement in Favor of the United States, is used when reinsurance is furnished with bonds for other purposes.

(b) For contracts performed in a foreign country, sureties not appearing on Treasury Department Circular 570 are acceptable if the contracting officer determines that it is impracticable for the contractor to use Treasury listed sureties.

(c) Treasury issues supplements to Treasury Department Circular 570, notifying all Federal agencies of new approved corporate surety companies and the termination of the authority of any specific corporate surety to qualify as a surety on Federal bonds. Upon receipt of notification of termination of a company's authority to qualify as a surety on Federal bonds, the contracting officer shall review the outstanding contracts and take action necessary to protect the Government, including, where appropriate, securing new bonds with acceptable sureties in lieu of outstanding bonds with the named company.

(d) Treasury Department Circular 570 may be obtained from the U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Fiscal Service, Surety Bond Branch, 3201 Pennsy Drive, Building E, Landover, MD 20785 or at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/suretyBnd/c570.htm.

[48 FR 42286, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 54 FR 48986, Nov. 28, 1989; 68 FR 28083, May 22, 2003; 71 FR 67779, Nov. 22, 2006; 79 FR 24210, Apr. 29, 2014; 86 FR 3684, Jan. 14, 2021]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1994–2014 · leading case: Allen Eng'g Contractor, Inc. v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 457 (Fed. Cl. 2014).
Allen Eng'g Contractor, Inc. v. United States, 115 Fed. Cl. 457 (Fed. Cl. 2014). · cites it 2× “Specifically, plaintiff claims that the Navy breached its obligations under the contract and violated its own regulations and FAR provisions throughout the bonding process in the following respects: (1) the Navy failed to contact the correct representative from PIC to…”
Airport Indus. Park, Inc. v. United States, 59 Fed. Cl. 332 (Fed. Cl. 2004). “202(a)(l)-(2) at 48 C.F.R. § 28.202 (a)(l)-(2) (1998) (stating, in a section titled “Acceptability of corporate sureties,” that only sureties listed on Department of the Treasury Circular 570 are acceptable and that “[i]f the penal amount exceeds the underwriting limit, the bond…”
United States v. Stern (1st Cir. 1994). “" See 48 C.F.R. 28.202(a)(1). The bonds must also be submitted on standard government forms: SF 24 (bid bond), SF 25 (payment bond) and SF 25A (performance bond).”
United States v. Stern (1st Cir. 1994). “" See 48 C.F.R. 28.202(a)(1). ___ The bonds must also be submitted on standard government forms: SF 24 (bid bond), SF 25 (payment bond) and SF 25A (performance bond).”
— 48 C.F.R. § 28.202(a)(1) — 2 cases
United States v. Stern (1st Cir. 1994). “" See 48 C.F.R. 28.202(a)(1). The bonds must also be submitted on standard government forms: SF 24 (bid bond), SF 25 (payment bond) and SF 25A (performance bond).”
United States v. Stern (1st Cir. 1994). “" See 48 C.F.R. 28.202(a)(1). ___ The bonds must also be submitted on standard government forms: SF 24 (bid bond), SF 25 (payment bond) and SF 25A (performance bond).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.