48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1
3.101-1 General.
Government business shall be conducted in a manner above reproach and, except as authorized by statute or regulation, with complete impartiality and with preferential treatment for none. Transactions relating to the expenditure of public funds require the highest degree of public trust and an impeccable standard of conduct. The general rule is to avoid strictly any conflict of interest or even the appearance of a conflict of interest in Government-contractor relationships. While many Federal laws and regulations place restrictions on the actions of Government personnel, their official conduct must, in addition, be such that they would have no reluctance to make a full public disclosure of their actions.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 26
cases (3 in the last 5 years), 1987–2025 · leading case: MORI Assocs., Inc. v. United States, 102 Fed. Cl. 503 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
MORI Assocs., Inc. v. United States, 102 Fed. Cl. 503 (Fed. Cl. 2011). “” 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 (2010). And plaintiff also bases jurisdiction on FAR section 1.”
KSEND v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 103 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “The plaintiff also argues that the defendant’s failure to respond to his requests for clarification was a prejudicial violation of the Federal Acquisition Regulations, including 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 (2004) (directing government officials to conduct government activities in an…”
DMS All-Star Jt. Venture v. United States, 90 Fed. Cl. 653 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “306 (e) (2008); see also 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 (2008) (“Government business shall be conducted in a manner above reproach and, except as authorized by statute or regulation, with complete impartiality and with preferential treatment for none.”
Galen Med. Assocs., Inc. v. United States, & Deborah Downing Md, Pllc, 369 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “And even to the extent the regulations require that any conflict of interest or even the appearance of a conflict of interest in government-contractor relationships be avoided, 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 (2003), Galen has failed to show any potential symbiotic relationship between the…”
Gulf Grp. Gen. Enter. Co. W.l.l., Plaintiff, v. United States, Defendant, 114 Fed. Cl. 258 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 states: Government business shall be conducted in a manner above reproach and, except as authorized by statute or regulation, with complete impartiality and with preferential treatment for none.”
Beacon Assocs., Inc. v. Apprio, Inc., 308 F. Supp. 3d 277 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “In These Circumstances, an Injunction is in the Public Interest Under 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 , "Transactions relating to the expenditure of public funds require the highest degree of public trust and an impeccable standard of conduct.”
FFTF Restoration Co. v. United States, 86 Fed. Cl. 226 (Fed. Cl. 2009). “101-1, 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 (2004) ("Standards of conduct.”
Myers v. Alutiiq Int'l Solutions, LLC, 811 F. Supp. 2d 261 (D.D.C. 2011). “48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 . The FAR further prohibit employers from “discharging], demoting] or otherwise discriminating] against an employee as a reprisal for disclosing information to .”
BayFirst Solutions, LLC v. United States, 104 Fed. Cl. 493 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “602-2 (b) and 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 when it canceled the Solicitation.”
INSLAW, Inc. v. United States (In Re INSLAW, Inc.), 83 B.R. 89 (D.D.C. 1988). “48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 . “Impartiality” as used in these regulations is further defined in the FAR at § 503.”
Omwenga v. United Nations Found., 244 F. Supp. 3d 214 (D.D.C. 2017). “2d at 266-67 (finding that 48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 and other statutes are “illustrative of the strong public policy against conflicts of interest and favoring the protection of whistleblowers”).”
Refine Constr. Co. v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 56 (Ct. Cl. 1987). “48 C.F.R. § 3.101-1 . The court is convinced and so finds that Mr.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.