48 C.F.R. § 49.000
49.000 Scope of part.
This part establishes policies and procedures relating to the complete or partial termination of contracts for the convenience of the Government or for default. It prescribes contract clauses relating to termination and excusable delay and includes instructions for using termination and settlement forms.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2026 · leading case: United States Ex Rel. MPA Constr., Inc. v. XL Specialty Ins., 349 F. Supp. 2d 934 (D. Maryland 2004).
United States Ex Rel. MPA Constr., Inc. v. XL Specialty Ins., 349 F. Supp. 2d 934 (D. Maryland 2004). “NIH did not state why the contract was terminated, but invited a “termination for convenience” settlement proposal, see generally 48 C.F.R. 49.000 et seq, which Jowett submitted on June 23, 2004.”
Singh v. South Asian Soc'y of George Washington Univ., 572 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2008). “, 48 C.F.R. § 49.000 , et seq. (2007) (termination of contracts), does not speak to whether the it is supervising such contractors’ performances on a day-to-day basis.”
Wolf Creek R.R. LLC v. Am. Ordnance LLC (W.D. Tenn. 2026). “” 48 C.F.R. § 49.000 . While it acknowledges that portions of FAR Part 49 (which it does not identify) are inapplicable, Plaintiff, in a twenty-two-page brief, fails to identify which provisions of FAR Part 49 do impose a contractual duty on AO to pay damages or pursue a pass-…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.