48 C.F.R. § 49.108-1
49.108-1 Subcontractor's rights.
A subcontractor has no contractual rights against the Government upon the termination of a prime contract. A subcontractor may have rights against the prime contractor or intermediate subcontractor with whom it has contracted. Upon termination of a prime contract, the prime contractor and each subcontractor are responsible for the prompt settlement of the settlement proposals of their immediate subcontractors.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2025 · leading case: Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins., 175 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 1999).
Morrison Knudsen Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins., 175 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 1999). “See 48 C.F.R. § 49.108-1 . See generally Kates, supra at 146 & n.”
United States ex rel. T.M.S. Mech. Contractors, Inc. v. Millers Mut. Fire Ins., 942 F.2d 946 (5th Cir. 1991). “” 48 C.F.R. § 49.108-1 *954 (1984); see also 48 C.”
United States v. Berkley Reg'l Ins., 986 F. Supp. 2d 660 (D. Maryland 2013). “” 48 C.F.R. § 49.108-1 . For this reason, the Federal Acquisition Regulations advise “that prime contractors [on government projects] ‘should’ include a ‘Termination for Convenience’ clause in their subcontracts ‘for their own protection____’ ” Steven W.”
Wolf Creek R.R. LLC v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2025). “48 C.F.R. § 49.108-1 (emphases added). Wolf Creek identifies no language in the 2018 TUA that expressly or implicitly creates a contractual relation- ship with the Army.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.