48 C.F.R. § 49.402-6

49.402-6 Repurchase against contractor's account.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) When the supplies or services are still required after termination, the contracting officer shall repurchase the same or similar supplies or services against the contractor's account as soon as practicable. The contracting officer shall repurchase at as reasonable a price as practicable, considering the quality and delivery requirements. The contracting officer may repurchase a quantity in excess of the undelivered quantity terminated for default when the excess quantity is needed, but excess cost may not be charged against the defaulting contractor for more than the undelivered quantity terminated for default (including variations in quantity permitted by the terminated contract). Generally, the contracting officer will make a decision whether or not to repurchase before issuing the termination notice.

(b) If the repurchase is for a quantity not over the undelivered quantity terminated for default, the Default clause authorizes the contracting officer to use any terms and acquisition method deemed appropriate for the repurchase. However, the contracting officer shall obtain competition to the maximum extent practicable for the repurchase. The contracting officer shall cite the Default clause as the authority. If the repurchase is for a quantity over the undelivered quantity terminated for default, the contracting officer shall treat the entire quantity as a new acquisition. If the repurchase is for a quantity over the undelivered quantity terminated for default, the contracting officer shall treat the entire quantity as a new acquisition.

(c) If repurchase is made at a price over the price of the supplies or services terminated, the contracting officer shall, after completion and final payment of the repurchase contract, make a written demand on the contractor for the total amount of the excess, giving consideration to any increases or decreases in other costs such as transportation, discounts, etc. If the contractor fails to make payment, the contracting officer shall follow the procedures in subpart 32.6 for collecting contract debts due the Government.

[48 FR 42447, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 50 FR 1745, Jan. 11, 1985; 50 FR 52429, Dec. 23, 1985]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1988–2016 · leading case: Armour of America v. United States
Armour of America v. United States (2011) uscfc · cites it 4× “, 78-1 BCA ¶ 12,986 , at 63,308); see also 48 C.F.R. § 49.402-6 (a), Repurchase Against Contractor’s Account (2003) (“When the supplies or services are still required after termination, the contracting officer shall repurchase the same or similar supplies or services against the…”
Century Marine Incorporated v. United States (1998) ca5 · cites it 2× “See 48 C.F.R. §§ 49.402-6 (c), 49.402-7, 49.402-2(e).”
M.E.S., Inc. v. United States (2012) uscfc · cites it 4× “” (emphasis added)); accord 48 C.F.R. § 49.402-6 (e) (2011) (“[T]he contracting officer shall, after completion and final payment *637 of the repurchase contract, make a written demand on the contractor for the total amount of the excess, giving consideration to any increases or…”
Ingham Regional Medical Center v. United States (2016) uscfc · cites it 2× “(quoting 48 C.F.R. § 49.402-6 (b)) (emphasis in SMS Data Prods.”
Sms Data Products Group, Inc. v. The United States (1988) cafc · cites it 2× “As a result of this revision, subsection (b) of 48 CFR § 49.402-6 , entitled “Repurchase against contractor’s account,” now reads: (b) If the repurchase is for a quantity not over the undelivered quantity terminated for default, the Default clause authorizes the contracting…”
Century Marine Inc v. United States (1998) ca5 “2 Under the Federal Acquisition Regulations, when the services to be provided by the terminated contractor are still required after default, the contracting officer shall repurchase the same services against the contractor’s account as soon as practicable, 48 C.F.R. § 49.402-6…”
— 48 C.F.R. § 49.402-6(c) — 1 case
M.E.S., Inc. v. United States (2012) uscfc “” (emphasis added)); accord 48 C.F.R. § 49.402-6 (e) (2011) (“[T]he contracting officer shall, after completion and final payment *637 of the repurchase contract, make a written demand on the contractor for the total amount of the excess, giving consideration to any increases or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.