C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER H—CLAUSES AND FORMS › PART 52—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES › Subpart 52.2—Text of Provisions and Clauses

48 C.F.R. § 52.236-15

52.236-15 Schedules for Construction Contracts.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

As prescribed in 36.515, insert the following clause:

Schedules for Construction Contracts (APR 1984)

(a) The Contractor shall, within five days after the work commences on the contract or another period of time determined by the Contracting Officer, prepare and submit to the Contracting Officer for approval three copies of a practicable schedule showing the order in which the Contractor proposes to perform the work, and the dates on which the Contractor contemplates starting and completing the several salient features of the work (including acquiring materials, plant, and equipment). The schedule shall be in the form of a progress chart of suitable scale to indicate appropriately the percentage of work scheduled for completion by any given date during the period. If the Contractor fails to submit a schedule within the time prescribed, the Contracting Officer may withhold approval of progress payments until the Contractor submits the required schedule.

(b) The Contractor shall enter the actual progress on the chart as directed by the Contracting Officer, and upon doing so shall immediately deliver three copies of the annotated schedule to the Contracting Officer. If, in the opinion of the Contracting Officer, the Contractor falls behind the approved schedule, the Contractor shall take steps necessary to improve its progress, including those that may be required by the Contracting Officer, without additional cost to the Government. In this circumstance, the Contracting Officer may require the Contractor to increase the number of shifts, overtime operations, days of work, and/or the amount of construction plant, and to submit for approval any supplementary schedule or schedules in chart form as the Contracting Officer deems necessary to demonstrate how the approved rate of progress will be regained.

(c) Failure of the Contractor to comply with the requirements of the Contracting Officer under this clause shall be grounds for a determination by the Contracting Officer that the Contractor is not prosecuting the work with sufficient diligence to ensure completion within the time specified in the contract. Upon making this determination, the Contracting Officer may terminate the Contractor's right to proceed with the work, or any separable part of it, in accordance with the default terms of this contract.

(End of clause) [48 FR 42478, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended at 60 FR 34761, July 3, 1995]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1993–2023 · leading case: United States Fire Insurance v. United States
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
United States Fire Insurance v. United States (2007) uscfc · cites it 6× “” 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-15 (a) (Oct. 1, 1995).”
Ryco Construction, Inc. v. United States (2002) uscfc “at 54-55; 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-15 . According to defendant, these “restrictions were placed upon the contractor for work at riparian sites, with discretion being provided to the COR regarding access to these sites.”
Commercial Contractors, Inc. v. United States (1993) uscfc “236-15 ( 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-15 ) provides the contractor shall prepare and submit to the CO for approval a practicable schedule showing the order in which the contractor proposes to perform the work, and the dates on which the contractor contemplates starting and completing the…”
P.R. Burke Corp. v. United States (2000) uscfc “48 C.F.R. § 52.236-15 (1994); Def.’s App.”
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty v. United States (2009) uscfc “See 48 C.F.R. 52.236-15 (2000). An NAS is required of contractors to show how they expect to complete the job.”
Speedway Orion JV (2023) asbca “” 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-15 (a). FAR 52.236-15(b) provides that “[t]he Contractor shall enter the actual progress on the chart as directed by the Contracting Officer.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.