48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7
52.236-7 Permits and Responsibilities.
As prescribed in 36.507, insert the following clause:
The Contractor shall, without additional expense to the Government, be responsible for obtaining any necessary licenses and permits, and for complying with any Federal, State, and municipal laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the performance of the work. The Contractor shall also be responsible for all damages to persons or property that occur as a result of the Contractor's fault or negligence. The Contractor shall also be responsible for all materials delivered and work performed until completion and acceptance of the entire work, except for any completed unit of work which may have been accepted under the contract.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 10
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2023 · leading case: bell/heery v. United States, 739 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
bell/heery v. United States, 739 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2014). “The Regulations section of the TDG expressly advises contractors that the FAR’s “Permits and Responsibilities clause,” set forth in 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7 , was incorporated into the contract and that it allocates all costs associated with obtaining permits to the Contractor…”
Vintage Autoworks, Inc. v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 143 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “]” 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7 . But, Flynn Jensen did not provide the CO with any evidence that the subcontractor’s facility, located at 4636 West Colonial Drive in Orlando, Florida, was in compliance with Florida state law and local ordinances regarding vehicle storage.”
Fraser v. United States, 490 F. Supp. 2d 302 (E.D.N.Y 2007). “Specifically, it incorporated 48 C.F.R. 52.236-7, which delegates to the contractor the responsibilities of “obtaining any necessary licenses and permits, and for complying with any Federal, State, and municipal laws, codes, and regulations applicable to the performance of the…”
Gartrell Constr. Inc. v. Aubry, 940 F.2d 437 (9th Cir. 1991). “As a contractor with the federal government, Gartrell had met the requirements of “responsibility” imposed on such contractors under the Federal Acquisition Regulation, 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7 (1990). Gartrell did not obtain a California contractor’s license; Gartrell believed…”
Kandarge v. United States Dept. of Navy, 849 F. Supp. 304 (D.N.J. 1994). “1, known as the Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FAR”), and imposed upon Phillyship the obligation to (1) ensure the work place safety of its employees, ( 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7 ); (2) to monitor and inspect its work progress and compliance with contract requirements on a daily…”
HVAC Constr. Co. v. United States, 28 Fed. Cl. 690 (Fed. Cl. 1993). “See 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7 (1989); 48 C.F.R. § 52.”
Rnj Interstate Corp. v. United States, 181 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 1999). “48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7 (emphasis added). RNJ began work in September 1991, and the government made progress pay *1331 ments to RNJ as the work' progressed.”
G & C Enter., Inc. v. United States, 55 Fed. Cl. 424 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “The contract incorporated by reference Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), 48 C.F.R. §§ 52.236-7 & 236-11 (2002), commonly known as the “Permits and Responsibilities” and the “Use and Possession Prior to Completion” clauses.”
Betance Enter., Inc. (A.S.B.C.A. 2023). “” 48 C.F.R. § 52.236-7 . 7. The contract incorporated by reference FAR 52.”
Bender GmbH v. Brownlee, 106 F. App'x 728 (Fed. Cir. 2004). “” 48 C.F.R. 52.236-7; Bender, 2003 WL 21489700 , Fact 6.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.