48 C.F.R. § 819.307

819.307 Protesting a firm's status as a service-disabled veteran-owned small business concern.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 8 cases, 2010–2017 · leading case: Miles Constr., Llc v. United States, 108 Fed. Cl. 792 (Fed. Cl. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Miles Constr., Llc v. United States, 108 Fed. Cl. 792 (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 18× “Miles alleges that VA contravened its regulations governing VOSB eligibility through an improper and inconsistent application of 48 C.F.R. § 819.307 (pertaining to “SDVOSB/VOSB Small Business Status Protests”) and 38 C.”

Ambuild Co., LLC v. United States, 119 Fed. Cl. 10 (Fed. Cl. 2014). · cites it 15× “On July 28, 2014, AmBuild invoked 48 C.F.R. § 819.307 (i) and appealed CVE’s Final Determination to the Executive Director of OSDBU.”

CS-360, LLC v. United States, 94 Fed. Cl. 488 (Fed. Cl. 2010). · cites it 15× “See 48 C.F.R. § 819.307 (c) (2010). Pending an interagency agreement with the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”), the Executive Director of the OSDBU decides protests of SDVOSB status raised by either another offeror or the contracting officer.”

KWV, Inc. v. United States, 108 Fed. Cl. 448 (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 5× “KWV alleges that VA contravened its regulations governing VOSB eligibility through an unreasonable and inconsistent application of 48 C.F.R. § 819.307 (pertaining to “SDVOSB/VOSB Small Business Status Protests”) 8 and 38 C.”

Kwv, Inc. v. United States, 111 Fed. Cl. 119 (Fed. Cl. 2013). · cites it 6× “KWV’s position is that VA’s inconsistent application of 48 C.F.R. § 819.307 (governing VOSB status protests) and 38 C.”

Cs-360, LLC v. U.S. Dep't of Vet. Affairs, 846 F. Supp. 2d 171 (D.D.C. 2012). · cites it 4× “48 C.F.R. § 819.307 (c). On January 29, 2010, the fourth lowest bidder on the Lexington Contract filed a protest challenging CS360’s SDVOSB eligibility.”

Vets. Contracting Grp., Inc. v. United States, 133 Fed. Cl. 613 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “448, 453 (2013) (finding jurisdiction where a bid protester alleged that the “VA contravened its regulations governing [veteran-owned small business] eligibility through an unreasonable and inconsistent application of 48 C.F.R. § 819.307 ... and 38 C.F.R. Part 74”) (citing…”

Miles Constr., LLC v. United States, 113 Fed. Cl. 174 (Fed. Cl. 2013). “First, the government argues that, according to the VA’s regulation governing agency protests, 48 C.F.R. § 819.307 , it was not obligated to provide Miles with any notice regarding the protest.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.