48 C.F.R. § 819.7002

819.7002 Applicability.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

Unless otherwise exempted by law, this subpart applies to VA contracting activities and contracts (see FAR 2.101) including BPAs and orders under FAR subpart 8.4 and acquisition of commercial products or commercial services under FAR part 12. In addition, this subpart applies to VA contractors, their subcontractors and to any Government entity that has a contract, agreement, or other arrangement with the VA to acquire goods and services on behalf of the VA (see 817.501). For applicability and VA policy regarding priorities for use of mandatory Government sources see 808.002.

[87 FR 63005, Oct. 18, 2022; 87 FR 71262, Nov. 22, 2022]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2012–2017 · leading case: Pds Consultants, Inc. v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 117 (Fed. Cl. 2017).
Pds Consultants, Inc. v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 117 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “” which restricts competition for contracts to veteran-owned small businesses and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses in cases where the contracting officer “has a reasonable expectation that two or more small business concerns owned and controlled by veterans will…”
Kingdomware Tech., Inc. v. United States, 107 Fed. Cl. 226 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “5 The 2006 Act applies only to supplies and services procured by VA See 48 C.F.R. § 819.7002 (“This subpart [implementing the 2006 Act] applies to VA contracting activities and to its prime contractors.”
Vets. Contracting Grp., Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2017). “”); see also 48 C.F.R. § 819.7002 (explaining that the VA’s implementing regulations apply only to “VA contracting activities and to its prime contractors” and “to any government entity that has a contract .”
Vets. Contracting Grp., Inc. v. United States (Fed. Cl. 2017). “”); see also 48 C.F.R. § 819.7002 (explaining that the VA’s implementing regulations apply only to “VA contracting activities and to its prime contractors” and “to any government entity that has a contract .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.