48 C.F.R. § 9.104
9.104 Standards.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 34
cases, 1990–2018 · leading case: Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “” 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 — 1(d). 2 On March 5, 1999, the contracting officer signed a responsibility determination, noting that JVC had “a satisfactory record of performance, integrity, and business ethics” and is “otherwise qualified and eligible to receive an award under applicable…”
Wood v. United States, 290 F.3d 29 (1st Cir. 2002). “2001); 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(a)-(d). Safety considerations are mentioned within the broad category of having “the necessary organization, experience, accounting and operational controls, and technical skills, or ability to obtain them (including, as appropriate, such elements as .”
United States of Am. John C. Cox v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 139 F.3d 984 (4th Cir. 1998). “In order to make that responsibility determination, the agency must conclude that the contractor has, among other things, “adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them,” 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(a); “a satisfactory performance record,” 48 C.”
Enhanced Vets. Solutions, Inc. v. United States, 131 Fed. Cl. 565 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “Plaintiff argues it was unreasonable for the agency to have found that FCi was responsible — and in particular to have found “a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics,” 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(d) — in light of allegations in the divorce proceedings involving two FCi…”
CSE Constr. Co. v. United States, 58 Fed. Cl. 230 (Fed. Cl. 2003). “” 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(c) (2001). Factors relevant to past performance evaluations are set out in FAR 9.”
Vintage Autoworks, Inc. v. United States, 132 Fed. Cl. 143 (Fed. Cl. 2017). “” 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(a)-(g). Vintage contends that the CO failed to consider 'that Flynn Jensen was inquired to “have the necessaiy production, construction, and technical equipment and facilities, or the ability to obtain them.”
OSG Prod. Tankers LLC v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 570 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “See 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(f) (“To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must .”
Action Serv. Corp. v. Garrett, 790 F. Supp. 1188 (D.P.R. 1992). “The structure of the regulations governing federal acquisition dictate that when awarding a section [8](a) contract, the Navy must conform to the normal procedure of making a 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 responsibility determination.”
Furniture By Thurston v. United States, 103 Fed. Cl. 505 (Fed. Cl. 2012). “See 48 C.F.R. §§ 9.104 -l(a), 9.402(a). Yet this court has never required a protestor to prove that it was certain to win a contract to show irreparable harm; instead, the disappointed bidder must establish that it was in a position to compete for the contract on a reasonable…”
Celtech, Inc. v. United States, 24 Cl. Ct. 269 (Ct. Cl. 1991). “602 -l(a)(2)(i) does not require the contracting officer to refer its determination to the SBA if the officer determines that the business is unqualified because it does not meet the standard in 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(g). This particular subsection states that a prospective…”
Alabama Aircraft Indus., Inc.-Birmingham v. United States, 83 Fed. Cl. 666 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “” 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(d). The PCAG described the Darlene Druyun matter “as a closed issue outside of past performance .”
Avtel Servs., Inc. v. Unites States, 70 Fed. Cl. 173 (Fed. Cl. 2005). “104-l(d), which provides that, “To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must—(d) Have a satisfactory record of integrity and business ethics,” 48 C.F.R. § 9.104 -l(d). The court concludes that it has jurisdiction to review this bid protest.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.