C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING › PART 9—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS › Subpart 9.4—Debarment, Suspension, and Ineligibility

48 C.F.R. § 9.406

9.406 Debarment.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18 cases, 1986–2020 · leading case: Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United States, 238 F.3d 1324 (Fed. Cir. 2001). “48 C.F.R. § 9.406 -l(a). The government urges that similarly, past improper actions by the former principal owner and head of two of JVC’s components does not mandate a finding of non-responsibility of JVC.”
Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufii v. United States, 52 Fed. Cl. 421 (Fed. Cl. 2002). · cites it 3× “48 C.F.R. § 9.406 — 2(a)(1) (1998). The debarment regulations state: The fraudulent, criminal, or other seriously improper conduct of any officer, director, shareholder, partner, employee, or other individual associated with a contractor may be imputed to the contractor when the…”
Burke v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 127 F. Supp. 2d 235 (D.D.C. 2001). · cites it 2× “300 ; 48 C.F.R. § 9.406 -l(a). Federal Acquisition Regulations (“FARs”) set forth relevant mitigating factors the agency should consider.”
John F. Robinson, Tr. for the Francis E. Heydt Co. v. Richard Cheney, Sec'y, U.S. Dep't of Def., 876 F.2d 152 (D.C. Cir. 1989). · cites it 2× “” 48 C.F.R. § 9.406 ~5(a). An agency may also extend a debarment order to any affiliate of a debarred contractor.”
Imco, Inc. v. United States, 97 F.3d 1422 (Fed. Cir. 1996). · cites it 2× “1991), that the process due a contractor facing a proposed debarment is satisfied by the procedures set out at 48 C.F.R. § 9.406 . IMCO’s final argument, that the proposed debarment was deficient, is similarly unavailing.”
Friedler v. Gen. Servs. Admin., 271 F. Supp. 3d 40 (D.D.C. 2017). “’ ” Popal, 2011 WL 6826176 , at *1 (quoting 48 C.F.R. § 9.406 — 3(b)(1)). And this opportunity is crucial, because the FAR establishes that “if a cause for debarment exists, the contractor has the burden of demonstrating, to the satisfaction of the debarring official, its…”
Shane Meat Co., Inc. & H. Ronald Shane v. United States Dep't of Def. & Def. Logistics Agency, 800 F.2d 334 (3rd Cir. 1986). · cites it 2× “406-l(a)(1984), and, as noted above, a three-year period of debarment is permissible under 48 C.F.R. § 9.406 (a). In addition, we are unconvinced that the DLA debarment decisions relied on by the appellees support the conclusion that leniency should be accorded in this case.”
James C. Caiola v. William H. Carroll, 851 F.2d 395 (D.C. Cir. 1988). “48 C.F.R. 9.406 — 3(d)(3) (emphasis added).”
OSG Prod. Tankers LLC v. United States, 82 Fed. Cl. 570 (Fed. Cl. 2008). “48 C.F.R. § 9.406 -l(a). . See supra Part III.”
Todd Constr., L.P. v. United States, 656 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2011). “See 48 C.F.R. § 9.406 . 8 . See also Richard J.”
Hickey v. Chadick, 649 F. Supp. 2d 770 (S.D. Ohio 2009). · cites it 2× “48 C.F.R. § 9.406 -l(c). On September 15, 2005, the DLA debarred plaintiffs from government contracting for a period of three years for *773 unsatisfactory performance on one or more government contracts pursuant to 48 C.”
Girard v. Klopfenstein, 930 F.2d 738 (9th Cir. 1991). · cites it 2× “Girard and Deef argue that the ASCS debarment procedures, pursuant to 48 C.F.R. §§ 9.406 , 409.406-3, are constitutionally deficient on their face.”
Show all 18 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.