C.F.R. » Title 48 » CHAPTER 1—FEDERAL ACQUISITION REGULATION › SUBCHAPTER B—ACQUISITION PLANNING › PART 9—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS › Subpart 9.6—Contractor Team Arrangements

48 C.F.R. § 9.602

9.602 General.

Read at: eCFRecfr.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Contractor team arrangements may be desirable from both a Government and industry standpoint in order to enable the companies involved to—

(1) Complement each other's unique capabilities; and

(2) Offer the Government the best combination of performance, cost, and delivery for the system or product being acquired.

(b) Contractor team arrangements may be particularly appropriate in complex research and development acquisitions, but may be used in other appropriate acquisitions, including production.

(c) The companies involved normally form a contractor team arrangement before submitting an offer. However, they may enter into an arrangement later in the acquisition process, including after contract award.

[48 FR 42142, Sept. 19, 1983, as amended 84 FR 19846, May 6, 2019]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1996–1996 · leading case: Tower Air, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Tower Air, Inc. v. Federal Express Corp. (1996) nyed “48 C.F.R. § 9.602 . Tower asserts that the joint venture here did not form a single economic unit and therefore the members could be considered co-conspirators and violate the antitrust laws.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.