For the purposes of this part:
(a) “Federal Aviation Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.”
(b) “Federal Highway Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Highway Administration.”
(c) “Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration.”
(d) “Federal Railroad Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Railroad Administration.”
(e) “Federal Transit Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Federal Transit Administration.”
(f) “Maritime Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Maritime Administration.”
(g) “National Highway Traffic Safety Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.”
(h) “Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.”
(i) “Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation Administrator” is synonymous with “Administrator of the Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation.”
Notes of Decisions
OSG Bulk Ships, Inc. v. United States, 132 F.3d 808 (D.C. Cir. 1998).
“” 49 C.F.R. § 1.4 (j)(l)-(2) (1997). 3 . The Court noted in particular that permanent releases into domestic trade do not carry the same potential for making competition unfair as temporary releases do: while a CDS-built vessel unrestrained in its ability to take temporary…”
Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm'n v. Gilbert, 40 A.3d 755 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
“” 49 C.F.R. § 1.4 (h)(1). The federal government may authorize a state to act as its agent to inspect interstate pipelines, but retains responsibility for enforcement of the regulations.”
Becker v. Litty, 566 A.2d 1101 (Md. 1990).
“49 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 (a)(3), 1.46(c)(7). In pertinent part, the General Bridge Act provides: The location and plans for [bridges over navigable waters] shall be approved by the Secretary of Transportation before construction is commenced, and, in approving the location and plans of…”
Conoco, Inc. v. Skinner, 970 F.2d 1206 (3rd Cir. 1992).
· cites it 2× “§ 2104 (1988); 49 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 (b), 1.46(d), and the administration of the transfer requirements to the Maritime Administration (“Marad").”
State of Delaware v. Bender, 370 F. Supp. 1193 (D. Del. 1974).
“49 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 (a)(3), 1.46. By virtue of his position as Commandant of the Coast Guard, the defendant, Admiral Bender, is vested with the responsibility and power to receive applications and issue permits for the construction of bridges over navigable waters.”
Enyeart v. Minnesota, 408 F. Supp. 2d 797 (D. Minnesota 2006).
“49 C.F.R. § 1.4 . The Secretary of Transportation is responsible for administering Section 40116 but the statute imposes no specific obligations on the Secretary.”
Conoco, Inc. v. Skinner, 781 F. Supp. 298 (D. Del. 1991).
“§§ 2103 , 2104 (1991); 49 C.F.R. §§ 1.4 (b), 1.4(j), 1.46(d), 1.”
— 49 C.F.R. § 1.4(a)(3) — 1 case
H. Jerome Sisselman & Lorraine Sisselman, His Wife, & Brancasons, Inc. v. Willard Smith, as Commandant, United States Coast Guard, & the United Statescoast Guard. H. Jerome Sisselman & Lorraine Sisselman, His Wife, in No. 18846, Brancasons, Inc., in No. 18847. H. Jerome Sisselman & Brancasons, Inc. v. New Jersey Tpk. Auth., Franklin Contracting Co., Willard Smith, Ascommandant, United States Coast Guard, & the United States Coast Guard. H. Jerome Sisselman, in No. 18848, Brancasons, Inc., Inno. 18849, 432 F.2d 750 (3rd Cir. 1970).
— 49 C.F.R. § 1.4(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.